BioMedNet HomeLibraryDatabasesCollaborationsJob ExchangeShopping MallYour Room


FULL TEXT (TEXT + FULL FIGURES)

Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Vol. 7, No. 1, February 1996
Biomagnetic neurosensors
[Review article]
Garry A Rechnitz, Christopher W Babb
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 1996, 7:55-59.
 
Viewing options [Help]

text only | + thumbnails | + full figures
 
 
Associated links
 
 
-> Publications by
Christopher W Babb | Garry A Rechnitz
 
 
-> Jump to this record in Evaluated MEDLINE
 
 
-> Related records from Evaluated MEDLINE
 
 
-> Related fulltext articles on BioMedNet
 


Outline


Abstract
Non-invasive measurement of the neuromodulatory activity of certain analytes is now possible through the use of biomagnetic stimulation and detection techniques. The timely development of room-temperature instrumentation and of more effective techniques for coupling neurons to transducers are the critical elements for rapid progress in this field.

Abbreviations
SQUID—superconducting quantum interference device.


Introduction

Effective monitoring of neuroactive biomolecules is a particularly challenging task because knowledge of analytical or total concentrations is rarely of much utility. Rather, it is important for most applications to evaluate the level of neuromodulatory activity and to establish a dose/response relationship. Because such activities may be inhibitory or stimulatory, selective or general, rapid or slow, transient or permanent, and simple or complex, in practice, no single experimental approach can meet the analytical requirements.

As a starting point, we postulate that the analytical system employed for monitoring neuroactivity would be optimal if it resembled, as much as possible, the natural environment to be probed. Thus, if we wished to assay drug–receptor interactions, we would use intact receptor structures in our analytical system, if we wished to study the effects of biomolecules on synapses, we would use synapses as analytical components, and if we wished to assess the effects of local anesthetics on neural action, we would incorporate neural tissue into our sensing apparatus.

In principle, a very wide array of transducers would be available to capture the desired analytical signal from such systems. Even so, the coupling of transducers with biological molecular recognition elements remains the central problem of all biosensor research and presents particularly severe technical and conceptual challenges in the case of neurosensors.

In this review, we examine some of the special factors involved in the design of neurosensors and attempt to show that the use of non-invasive biomagnetic techniques offers some potential advantages over more traditional (e.g. electrophysiological) approaches. Recently, biomagnetic neurosensors have emerged as viable analytical tools for studying neuromodulatory activity; our group [1•] [2•] [3••] has been the chief proponents of biomagnetic neurosensor research, publishing the only works dealing directly with the subject matter over the past two years. Even so, a variety of research preceded and facilitated the development of these techniques. Some of the focus of this review is on such earlier work in order to show how biomagnetic neurosensors have evolved. A discussion of neural biosensors employing electrophysiological techniques, developed by our group and by others, as well as the construction and testing of a biomagnetic probe by researchers at Vanderbilt University, provides much of the background needed to understand the experimental techniques and data handling related to biomagnetic neurosensors. Finally, possible future directions for this technique as an analytical tool are explored.



Neuronal biosensors

The rapid advances in biomagnetic neurosensors over the past year have been made possible, in large part, by previous research involving neural tissue that is sensitive to neuromodulatory chemicals. The earliest analytical applications employed antennules from blue crabs and used microelectrodes to detect increased neural firing frequency in response to chemical stimulants flowing past chemoreceptor sites on the antennules [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. In these experiments, antennules showed highly sensitive and selective responses to specific excitatory amino acids, purines (5'-AMP and ADP), and an invertebrate hormone. The frequency increase observed was often so dramatic that methods of frequency counting and quantification were problematic. In later work, intact antennular chemoreceptors from Hawaiian crabs and crayfish were also successfully incorporated into neural biosensors [9] [10] [11] [12]. Readers may wish to consult previous reviews on these topics [13] [14].

The applicability and utility of neural sensors was greatly increased when conduction blockers were incorporated into the system. Initially, chemical stimulants were applied to antennular and walking leg (pereiopod) preparations followed by solutions of local anesthetics [15]. The exposure of the stimulated nerve tissue to anesthetics led to decreases in the observed compound action potential, which showed good correlation with the concentration of anesthetic solution applied. Although this method did prove successful, it relied not only on the ability of the anesthetics to block the action potentials, but also on the chemical stimulant to induce such potentials. The experimental protocol was difficult to reproduce and often proved cumbersome in practice. The replacement of chemical stimulation with electrical stimulation, provided through a second microelectrode attached to exposed walking leg nerves [16], enabled precise stimulus triggering and was critical in providing better reproducibility, improved ease of application and easier data handling.

Other current approaches in neural sensing research involve additional species, particularly the pond snail, Lymnea stagnalis, whose visceral ganglia and its responses to serotonin and acetylcholine form the basis for a whole-cell biosensor [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]. In this system, application of serotonin, and, to a lesser extent, acetylcholine solutions, evoked an increase in firing frequency of exposed neurons that was dependent on concentration. Perhaps the most useful information provided by these studies pertains to the effect of temperature on the response characteristics of snail neural preparations [18] [19] [20]. Snail neurons were more sensitive to neuroactive molecules at higher temperatures (up to 35° C), but times between analyte injections must be increased. Therefore, it is possible to tailor conditions to fit specific experimental criteria. The most recent paper in this series provides a discussion of both kinetic modeling of responses in the neural preparations and how well the model compares with observed responses [21]. To facilitate further progress in the field of neural biosensors, studies involving modeling and theoretical considerations must be included in ongoing research efforts.

Will neural sensors have any practical utility? One area in which they have proven themselves is that of screening for potential neuroactive agents. A particularly novel approach involves the use of cultured mouse neurons to detect organophosphate nerve agents in soil [22]. The approach involves the exposure of nerve cells to contaminated soil samples and the subsequent use of biochemical assays to determine acetylcholinesterase levels that correspond to exposure levels in the soil. Organophosphates are found not only in pesticides, but also in chemical warfare agents, and such screening could help monitor the use and abuse of these potentially deadly compounds.



Biomagnetic measurements

Early biomagnetic measurements were generally performed using superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometers and, among other limitations, required liquid-nitrogen cooling [23] [24] [25]. These devices provide good sensitivity and experimental reproducibility, but are not feasible for use in most analytical laboratories. Cardiac research has been aided, in large part, by biomagnetic measurements, and this trend will probably continue [26] [27] [28] [29] [30].

For the analytical development of biomagnetic neurosensors, a device was needed that would operate under conditions that were less extreme than those required by the SQUID. The biomagnetic current probe, which was developed and tested at Vanderbilt University, provides a highly sensitive low-cost means of measuring action currents at room temperature and fits the bill perfectly [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]. The device consists of control electronics, amplifier circuitry and a toroid or current probe; it has been described in great detail by van Egeraat and Wikswo [36]. The control electronics provide a pulse that can be connected to a stimulus isolator, allowing adjustable stimulus levels to be applied to nerve tissue. The amplifier circuitry permits signals collected through the probe to be filtered and amplified before output. The toroid consists of a ferrite core wrapped with copper wire and sealed with electrovarnish. The entire wrapped core is encased in epoxy to protect it from the saline solution. A good deal of research has been carried out by the original developers both on the design and improvement of toroids and on how toroid size, wire size and number of wraps improve the signal-to-noise characteristics of the detection system [35].

Experiments involving the biomagnetic probe system have been based on the detection of biomagnetic currents in nerves and muscles in a variety of species and under many conditions [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]. The system has even been shown to be of utility during surgical procedures [42]. The benefits of the system and its advantages over the SQUID in many situations led to the commercial development of the biomagnetic probe [32] [35] [36]. The commercial availability of the probe made our advances in biomagnetic neurosensors possible. The researchers responsible for this apparatus continue to make valuable contributions to the field of biomagnetic measurements [43] [44] [45].



Biomagnetic neurosensors

The development of biomagnetic neurosensors resulted from the marriage of the techniques and results obtained with neural sensors and the technology that became available with the development of the biomagnetic current probe. The impetus for development lay in the continuing search for sensors that are non-invasive. Unlike microelectrodes, which can damage the neural membranes when suction is applied, the toroids themselves are not in direct contact with the nerve tissue. Furthermore, work by Wikswo and colleagues [35] [42] [46] [47] had shown that toroids could be developed that were capable of being closed around nerve fibers, an adaptation necessary if future application to fully intact nerves were to be made.

Application of the biomagnetic current probe to neural biosensing was the first step toward a completely magnetic neurosensor ([1•]; Fig. 1). In this work, and all biomagnetic neurosensor research to date, the giant axons of freshwater crayfish are employed, together with the following experimental procedures. First, the axons are dissected from cold-anesthetized specimens and placed immediately in a specially designed flow cell where modified van Harreveld's saline is flowed over the nerve. If toroids are employed, the nerve is threaded through the lumen of the toroid and pinned within the flow cell. When electrodes are used, they are attached to the nerve membrane by gentle suction. A stimulus current is applied at a frequency of 0.5thinspace Hz and adjusted using a stimulus isolator until a steady action potential is observed with an oscilloscope. A lidocaine solution is then applied and the oscilloscope monitored to observe the decrease in, and eventual blocking of, the action potential. Both the time to block the signal and the duration of block are plotted versus the concentration of lidocaine applied to construct calibration curves. Excellent dose/response curves, over a concentration range of 5thinspace mM to 50thinspace mM, could be obtained. We have also presented action potentials captured by computer in this work [1•]. This paper set the stage for all work to follow and showed that biomagnetic measurements could indeed be used as analytical sensors; nevertheless, it was based on proven techniques, as discussed in the previous section. The choice of crayfish as a source of neurons was primarily based not on fundamental considerations, but convenience.

Figure 1 Block diagram for a biomagnetic neurosensor. (a) Components for sample introduction and biological tissue support. (b) System of components for a biomagnetic neurosensor. The pathways for (i) magnetic stimulus, (ii) biomagnetic data collection, and (iii) electrical detection with either electrical or magnetic stimulus are depicted.

Return to text reference [1]

Magnetic stimulation of nerves has been successfully employed in medical situations and, in general, involves stimulating a portion of the brain and observing muscle movements [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56]. Our group [2•] was the first to employ the biomagnetic probe for magnetic stimulation as a step toward a completely magnetic sensor. The implications of this advance are, however, likely to extend beyond the immediate application discussed here and have a broader impact on neurochemical and biomedical research.

Several factors made the employment of a biomagnetic stimulus more complicated. First, specimen size seemed to be fairly important because large crayfish were necessary to obtain consistent results. Second, stimulus levels needed to be ~ 10-fold higher than those for electrical stimulus, but were still well within the working range of the stimulus isolator. Finally, toroids constructed for detection were often plagued by durability problems as they were not designed to carry large stimulus currents.

Results obtained in this work [2•] show that magnetic stimulation correlates well with data obtained electrically and little difference is observed in sensitivity and reproducibility [16]. Excellent calibration curves can be obtained for local anesthetics (e.g. tetracaine and lidocaine), and sensor lifetimes are significantly extended in comparison with electrical transducers.

Our most recent paper [3••] represents the first report of the simultaneous use of magnetic stimulation and biomagnetic detection and, therefore, the first fully magnetic neural biosensor. The experimental techniques and analytes employed are similar to earlier reports and results confirm that calibration curves using fully magnetic methods are virtually identical to those obtained with electrical detection under similar conditions. Interestingly, preliminary data show a working lifetime increase for fully magnetic sensors of nearly 50% over fully electrical techniques. This seems to support the hypothesis that microelectrodes do have some deleterious effects on nerve preparations and that magnetic toroids appear to alleviate these problems.

The construction of more reliable stimulus toroids is critical to progress in this research area. When heavier wire is used to wrap the ferrite cores, a reduction in the failure rate is seen compared with toroids with smaller wire. Stimulus toroids are not necessarily difficult to construct because they need to deliver an induced current in excess only of the current necessary to cause nerve firing. Signal-to-noise ratios are also not a major concern. Yet, fewer than half the toroids constructed to date have functioned effectively for any significant length of time.

A critical examination of biomagnetic methods and electrical methods in relation to the development of neural sensors is needed. Increased lifetimes and the potential for a non-invasive sensor in the future must be weighed against the higher costs and procedural difficulties associated with biomagnetic methods. Once the initial challenges of start-up and costs are overcome, both methods seem to have a future in the field of neural sensing.

Currently, work is continuing in areas of interest related to the advancement of biomagnetic neurosensors. Methods of improving the construction of stimulus toroids to permit greater predictability of function are being explored. Extensive, if preliminary, data on conditions of experimentation that affect sensor performance and reproducibility have been collected. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the use of biomagnetic sensors in screening real samples for potential neuromodulatory action is under way, with special emphasis on extracts from plants suspected of having such activity.



Conclusions

In the past year, a new analytical technique has emerged that combines the desirable aspects of neural biosensors and biomagnetic techniques. We have shown that this technique compares favorably with earlier methods and lays a foundation for a fully non-invasive sensor in the future. The use of magnetic toroids and intact nerve tissue provides an approach for investigating neural processes more completely while avoiding some problems often associated with 'classical' neurophysiological methods. Analytical lifetimes are extended and sensitivity to analytes is not compromised. The future of these sensors may lie in their ability to rapidly screen suspected neuromodulatory substances at a relatively low cost. A variety of tissue types could provide a wide array of analytical and clinical information. Biomagnetic neurosensors are still somewhat limited in scope because of experimental challenges and difficulties in obtaining equipment. Yet, we foresee that they will become a viable and valuable addition to the arsenal of techniques for investigating neurophysiology and analytical chemistry.



References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest.
•• of outstanding interest.
  1. • Leech D, Rechnitz GA:
    Biomagnetic neurosensors.
    Anal Chem 1993, 65: 3262–3266. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Although not strictly in the period of review, this is the first in a series of papers introducing biomagnetic neurosensors (see [2•] [3••]). It is the first report in which the biomagnetic current probe is employed for analytical purposes. Interesting data tracings show action currents both before and immediately following anesthetic block.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

  2. • Coon DR, Babb CW, Rechnitz GA:
    Biomagnetic neurosensors. 2. Magnetically stimulated sensors.
    Anal Chem 1994, 66: 3193–3197. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    In this work, the biomagnetic probe is used for the first time to stimulate nerve firing. An explanation of the experimental process is provided. General background into the physics of biomagnetic stimulus and how it relates to sensor design are also presented. Magnetically stimulated action potentials are depicted along with a detailed diagram of the experimental apparatus.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

  3. •• Babb CW, Coon DR, Rechnitz GA:
    Biomagnetic neurosensors. 3. Noninvasive sensors using magnetic stimulation and biomagnetic detection.
    Anal Chem 1995, 67: 763–769. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    The third and most important paper in the series on biomagnetic neurosensor research (see also [1•] [2•]). The techniques described in [1•] [2•] are combined to construct a fully magnetic sensor that is, most likely, a prototype for all biomagnetic neurosensor research in the near future. In-depth descriptions are provided of stimulus toroid construction and experimental modifications necessary to accommodate dual toroids within the flow cell. Comparisons of electrical and magnetic methods are made using computer-captured data. It is also shown that lifetimes of the fully magnetic sensor are far better than those obtained with electrical techniques. The authors highlight some of the limitations associated with magnetic measurements and postulate what the future holds for this method in analytical chemistry.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2] [3]

  4. Belli SL, Rechnitz GA:
    Prototype potentiometric biosensor using intact chemoreceptor structures.
    Anal Lett 1986, 19: 403–416. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  5. Belli SL, Buch RM, Rechnitz GA:
    Response model for chemoreceptor biosensors.
    Anal Lett 1987, 20: 327–336. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  6. Belli SL, Rechnitz GA:
    Biosensors based on native chemoreceptors.
    Fresnius Z Anal Chemie 1988, 331: 439–447.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  7. Buch RM, Rechnitz GA:
    Intact chemoreceptor-based biosensors: extreme sensitivity to some excitatory amino acids.
    Anal Lett 1989, 22: 2685–2702. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  8. Buch RM, Rechnitz GA:
    Intact chemoreceptor-based biosensors: responses and analytical limits.
    Biosensors 1989, 4: 215–230. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  9. Barker TQ, Buch RM, Rechnitz GA:
    Intact chemoreceptor-based biosensors.
    Biotechnol Prog 1990, 6: 498–503. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  10. Buch RM, Barker TQ, Rechnitz GA:
    Intact chemoreceptor biosensors based on Hawaiian aquatic species.
    Anal Chim Acta 1991, 243: 157–166. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  11. Wijesuriya D, Rechnitz GA:
    Construction and properties of a pyrazinamide selective biosensor using chemoreceptor structures from crayfish.
    Anal Chim Acta 1992, 256: 39–46. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  12. Wijesuriya D, Rechnitz GA:
    Reusable neuronal biosensor for the determination of 3-acetyl pyridine neurotoxin.
    Anal Chim Acta 1992, 264: 189–196. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  13. Buch RM, Rechnitz GA:
    Neuronal biosensors.
    Anal Chem 1989, 61: 533–542. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  14. Leech D, Rechnitz GA:
    Neuronal biosensors: a progress report.
    Electroanalysis 1993, 5: 103–111. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  15. Leech D, Rechnitz GA:
    Crayfish walking leg neuronal biosensor for the detection of pyrazinamide and selected local anesthetics.
    Anal Chim Acta 1993, 274: 25–35. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  16. Leech D, Rechnitz GA:
    Neuronal-based assay and detection of local anesthetics using electrically stimulated crayfish walking leg nerves.
    Anal Lett 1993, 26: 1259–1279. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  17. Skeen RS, Kisaalita WS, Van Wie BJ, Fung SJ, Barnes CD:
    Evaluation of neuron-based sensing with the neurotransmitter serotonin.
    Biosens Bioelectron 1990, 5: 491–510. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  18. Kurdikar DL, Skeen RS, Van Wie BJ: Whole cell biosensors: a brief overview and presentation of a novel neuron-based approach. In Frontiers in Bioprocessing II: Proceedings of Frontiers in Bioprocessing II. Edited by Todd P, Skidar S, Bier M. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1992, 126–137.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  19. Kurdikar DL, Skeen RS, Van Wie BJ:
    Temperature effects on neuron-based chemical sensing in well-mixed flow environments.
    Anal Chim Acta 1992, 262: 1–12. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  20. Skeen RS, Van Wie BJ, Fung SJ, Barnes CD:
    Effects of temperature and analyte application technique on neuron-based chemical sensing.
    Biosens Bioelectron 1992, 7: 91–101. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  21. Skeen RS, Kurdikar DL, Van Wie BJ:
    Modeling the kinetics of neuron-based chemical sensing: interactions between observable states.
    Biosens Bioelectron 1994, 9: 265–274. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  22. Sawyer TW, Weiss MT, D'Agostino PA, Provost LR, Hancock JR:
    Bioassay of organophosphate nerve agents in soil using neuronal tissue culture.
    J Appl Toxicol 1992, 12: 1–6. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  23. Ernι SN, Curio G, Trahms L, Trontelj Z, Aust P: Magnetic activity of a single peripheral nerve in man. In Biomagnetism 1987. Edited by Atsumi K, Kotani M, Ueno S, Katila T, Williamson SJ. Tokyo: Tokyo Denki University Press, 1987, 166–169.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  24. Trahms L, Ernι SN, Trontelj Z, Curio G, Aust P:
    Biomagnetic functional localization of a peripheral nerve in man.
    Biophys J 1989, 55: 1145–1153. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  25. Hari R, Hδllstrφm J, Tiihonen J, Joutsiniemi SL:
    Multichannel detection of magnetic compound action fields of median and ulnar nerves.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989, 72: 277–280. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  26. Reichenberger H, Schneider S, Moshage W, Weismuller P:
    Biomagnetic multi-channel systems. Principles and application in cardiology.
    Clin Physiol 1992, 12: 325–333. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  27. Weismuller P, Richter P, Abraham-Fuchs K, Harer W, Schneider S, Hoher M, Kochs M, Edrich J, Hombach V:
    Spatial differences of the duration of ventricular late fields in the signal-averaged magnetocardiogram in patients with ventricular late potentials.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993, 16: 70–79. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  28. Curio G, Ernι SN, Burghoff M, Wolff KD, Pilz A:
    Non-invasive neuromagnetic monitoring of nerve and muscle injury currents.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993, 89: 154–160. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  29. Achenbach ST, Moshage W:
    Magnetocardiology: clinical investigations with a biomagnetic multichannel system.
    Physiological Measurement 1993, 14: A61–A68. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  30. Nomura M, Nakaya Y, Saito K, Kishi F, Watatsuki T, Miyoshi H, Nishikado A, Bando S, Ito S, Nishitani H:
    Noninvasive localization of accessory pathways by magnetocardiographic imaging.
    Clin Cardiol 1994, 17: 239–244. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  31. Wikswo JP:
    Improved instrumentation for measuring the magnetic field of cellular action currents.
    Rev Sci Instrum 1982, 53: 1846–1850. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  32. Wikswo JP, Samson PC, Giffard RP:
    A low-noise low input impedance amplifier for magnetic measurement of nerve action currents.
    Inst Electrical Electron Engineers Trans Biomed Eng 1983, BME-30: 215–221.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  33. Wikswo JP, Henry WP, Samson PC, Giffard RP: A current probe for measuring cellular action currents. In Biomagnetism: Applications and Theory. Edited by Weinberg H, Stroink G, Katila T. New York: Pergamon, 1985, 83–87.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  34. Roth BJ, Wikswo JP:
    The magnetic field of a single axon: a comparison of theory and experiment.
    Biophys J 1985, 48: 93–109. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  35. Gielen FLH, Roth BJ, Wikswo JP:
    Capabilities of a toroid-amplifier system for magnetic measurement of current in biological tissue.
    Inst Electrical Electron Engineers Trans Biomed Eng 1986, BME-33: 910–921.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2] [3] [4]

  36. Van Egeraat JM, Wikswo JP: A low-cost biomagnetic current probe system for the measurement of action currents in biological fibers. In Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects. Edited by Hoke M, Ernι SN, Okada Y, Romani G. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991, 895–899.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2] [3]

  37. Wikswo JP, Van Egeraat JM:
    Cellular magnetic fields: fundamental and applied measurements on nerve axons, peripheral nerve bundles, and skeletal muscle.
    J Clin Neurophysiol 1991, 8: 170–188. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  38. Van Egeraat JM, Wikswo JP: Measurement of nonuniform propagation in the squid nervous system with a room-temperature magnetic current probe. In Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects. Edited by Hoke M, Ernι S, Okada Y, Romani G. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991, 385–388.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  39. Gielen FLH, Friedman RN, Wikswo JP:
    In vivo magnetic and electrical recordings from nerve bundles and single motor units in mammalian skeletal muscle.
    J Gen Physiol 1991, 90: 1043–1061. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  40. Van Egeraat JM, Stasaski R, Barach JP, Friedman RN, Wikswo JP:
    The biomagnetic signature of a crushed axon. A comparison of theory and experiment.
    Biophys J 1993, 64: 1299–1305. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  41. Van Egeraat JM, Friedman RN, Wikswo JP:
    Magnetic field of a single muscle fiber. First measurements and a core conductor model.
    Biophys J 1990, 57: 663–667. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  42. Wikswo JP, Henry WP, Friedman RN, Kilroy AW, Wijesinghe RS, Van Egeraat JM, Milek MA: Intraoperative recording of the magnetic field of a human nerve. In Advances in Biomagnetism. Edited by Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M. New York: Plenum, 1990, 137–140.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  43. Golzarian J, Staton DJ, Wikswo JP, Friedman RN, Richards WO:
    Diagnosing intestinal ischemia using a noncontact superconducting quantum interference device.
    Am J Surg 1994, 167: 586–592. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  44. Barach JP, Wikswo JJ:
    Magnetic fields from stimulated cardiac action currents.
    Inst Electrical Electron Engineers Trans Biomed Eng 1994, 41: 969–974.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  45. Bradshaw LA, Garrard CL, Wikswo JP, Richards WO:
    Transabdominal magnetic recording of small-bowel ischemia in anesthetized rabbits.
    Gastroenterology 1994, 107: 1234. [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  46. Leifer MC, Wikswo JP:
    Optimization of a clip-on SQUID current probe.
    Rev Sci Inst 1983, 54: 1017–1022.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  47. Wikswo JP:
    Magnetic measurements on single nerve axons and nerve bundles.
    Med Biol Eng Comput 1985, 23: 77–78. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  48. Stuchly MA, Esselle KP:
    Factors affecting neural stimulation with magnetic fields.
    Bioelectromagnetics 1992, (suppl 1): 191–204. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  49. Counter SA, Borg E, Bredberg G, Linde G, Vainio M:
    Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system of deaf patients.
    Acta Otolaryngol 1994, 114: 501–509.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  50. Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Patel PM, Sano T, Chesnut RM:
    Effects of droperidol, pentobarbital, and ketamine on myogenic transcranial magnetic motor-evoked responses in humans.
    Neurosurgery 1994, 35: 1066–1071. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  51. Classen J, Witte OW, Schlaug G, Seitz RJ, Holthausen H, Benecke R:
    Epileptic seizures triggered directly by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 94: 19–25. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  52. Ridding MC, Inzelberg R, Rothwell JC:
    Changes in excitability of motor cortical circuitry in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Ann Neurol 1995, 37: 181–188. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  53. Tomberg C:
    Differential voluntary programming of fingers extensor commands revealed by non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain.
    Neurosci Lett 1995, 185: 41–43. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  54. Braune HJ, Fritz C:
    Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked inhibition of voluntary muscle activity (silent period) is impaired in patients with ischemic hemispheric lesion.
    Stroke 1995, 26: 550–553. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  55. Jennum P, Winkel H, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A:
    Repetitive magnetic stimulation and motor evoked potentials.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 97: 96–101. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]

  56. Schmid UD, Moller AR, Schmid J:
    Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the trigeminal nerve: intraoperative study on stimulation characteristics in man.
    Muscle Nerve 1995, 18: 487–494. [MEDLINE] [Cited by]
    Return to citation reference [1]



Author Contacts
Garry A Rechnitz and Christopher W Babb, Hawaii Biosensor Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2545 The Mall, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822-2275, USA.
Return to author list


Copyright

Copyright © 1996 Current-Opinion.com
Help   Feedback      Search   Map
Black Line
© 1998-1999 BioMedNet. All rights reserved.
email: info@biomednet.com.