Contents
Contents
C
oliforms are Gram-negative, rod-shaped facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Identification criteria used are production of gas from glucose (and other sugars) and fermentation of lactose to acid and gas within 48 h at 35ºC (Hitchins et al., 1998).The coliform group includes species from the genera Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter, and includes E. coli. Coliforms were historically used as indicator microorganisms to serve as a measure of fecal contamination, and thus potentially, of the presence of enteric pathogens in fresh water. Although some coliforms are found in the intestinal tract of man, most are found throughout the environment and have little sanitary significance (Greenberg and Hunt, 1985).
The presence of large numbers of coliforms in foods is highly undesirable, but it would be almost impossible to eliminate all forms (Jay, 1978). Because they are easily killed by heat, coliform counts can be useful when testing for post-processing contamination of cooked fish and fishery products.
Contents
Because coliform counts are inadequate to differentiate between fecal and nonfecal contamination, a fecal coliform test was developed. Fecal coliforms are coliforms that ferment lactose in EC medium with gas production within 48 h at 45.5ºC. With all shellfish isolates, an incubation temperature of 44.5ºC (rather than 45.5ºC) is used. Fecal coliforms are considered to be more directly associated with fecal contamination from warm-blooded vertebrates than are other members of the coliforms. E. coli usually makes up 75-95% of the fecal coliform count in shellfish growing areas, but at times can represent less than 1% of the coliform count (APHA, 1970; Greenberg and Hunt, 1985; Paille et al., 1987).
Contents
E. coli are naturally found in the intestinal tracts of all warm-blooded animals, including humans. Most forms of the bacteria are not pathogenic and serve useful functions in the intestine. Pathogenic strains of E. coli are transferred to seafood through sewage pollution of the coastal environment or by contamination after harvest. E. coli food infection causes abdominal cramping, water or bloody diarrhea, fever, nausea and vomiting (Ward et al., 1997).
Some E. coli strains may be only weakly lactose-positive (delayed lactose fermentation) or even lactose-negative (APHA, 1970; Ewing, 1986).
Enterovirulent E. coli (EEC) strains include several major subgroups:
Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) causes hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Six verotoxins have been identified within this group, but only stx-1 and stx-2 seem to be important in human infections. E. coli O157:H7 is the principle serotype of this group (Reed, 1994).
Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) causes a diarrheal illness similar to shigellosis (Reed, 1994).
Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) is a major cause of travelers' diarrhea and infant diarrhea in developing countries. These strains product a heat-labile toxin (LT) and/or a heat-stable toxin (ST) (Reed, 1994).
Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is an important cause of infant diarrhea (Reed, 1994).
Enteroadherent E. coli (EAEC) is a newly added category and not fully characterized (Hitchins et al., 1998).
Some properties of enterovirulent E. coli (EEC) subgroups are presented in Table 14-1 (Hitchins et al., 1998). For a full discussion, consult one of the recent reviews (DuPont et al., 1971;Levine, 1987).
Table 14-1. Some properties of the enterovirulent E. coli (EEC) subgroups (Hitchins et al., 1998)a
Property |
ETEC |
EPEC |
EHEC |
EIEC |
Toxin |
LT/STb |
Verocytotoxin (endogenous) |
Verocytoxin |
- |
Invasive |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
Stool |
Watery |
Watery, bloody |
Watery, very bloody |
Mucoid, bloody |
Fever |
Low |
+ |
- |
+ |
Fecal leukocytes |
- |
- |
- |
|
Intestine involved |
Small |
Small |
Colon |
Colon, lower small |
Serology |
Infantile types |
O157:H7 & a few other serotypes |
||
High |
High |
Low |
Low |
Contents
Contents
|
|
|
Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen - domestic | 1 or more of 5 subs exceeding MPN of 330/100 g or 2 or more exceeding 230/100 g | FDA, 1998a |
Table 14-3. FDA guidelines for E. coli in fish and fishery products.
|
|
|
Crabmeat, fresh and frozen | MPN of at least 3.6 per gram (IMVIC confirmed) in one or more of a minimum of 6 subsamples and inspectional evidence indicating the most probable source of the E. coli. | FDA, 1996b |
Shrimp, raw breaded | Mean log of 16 units of finished product breaded shrimp collected prior to freezing is greater than 0.56 (i.e., geometric mean greater than 3.6/g) and exceeds the mean log of 16 units of stock shrimp by more than twice the standard error of their difference (2 SED). | FDA, 1996a |
Oysters and clams, fresh or frozen - imports | MPN of 230/100 g (average of subs or 3 or more of 5 subs) | FDA, 1998a |
Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen - domestic | 1 or more of 5 subs exceeding MPN of 330/100 g or 2 or more exceeding 230/100 g | FDA, 1998a |
Table 14-4. FDA guidelines for enterotoxigenic E. coli in fish.
|
|
|
Ready-to-eat fishery products (minimum cooking by consumer) | 1 x 103 ETEC/g, LT1 or ST2 positive | FDA, 1998a |
Contents
State | Products |
Fecal coliforms (MPN) |
E. coli (MPN) |
Alabama | Oysters, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Alaska | Oysters, clams, mussels
Oysters, clams, mussels (eviscerated) |
100/100g |
- |
Arizona | Clams, mussels, oysters |
|
|
Arkansas | - |
|
|
California | Oysters, clams, mussels |
|
|
Colorado | Oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops |
|
|
Connecticut | Oysters, clams, mussels |
|
|
Delaware | Clams, mussels, oysters, or other mollusks, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Florida | Shellfish |
|
|
Blue crab | |||
Georgia | Clams, mussels, oysters, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Scallops: fried, frozen; breaded, frozen |
|
|
|
Crabmeat, cooked, fresh |
|
|
|
Deviled crab: frozen, cooked; fresh, uncooked |
|
|
|
Shrimp, peeled, cooked |
|
|
|
Shrimp, breaded, frozen, raw |
|
|
|
Fish, frozen, breaded, fried |
|
|
|
Fish, frozen, breaded, raw |
|
|
|
Hawaii | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Idaho |
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
|
Iowa |
|
|
|
Kansas |
|
|
|
Kentucky | Oysters, clams, scallops, shrimp, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Louisiana |
|
|
|
Maine |
|
|
|
Maryland | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Crabmeat, fresh |
|
|
|
Crabmeat, pasteurized |
|
|
|
Massachusetts | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
Minnesota |
|
|
|
Mississippi | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Missouri | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Foods |
|
|
|
Montana |
|
|
|
Nebraska | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Deli foods (shrimp salad, etc.) |
|
|
|
Nevada | - | <
|
|
New Hampshire | Oysters, softshell clams, fresh or frozen |
|
|
New Jersey | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
"Potentially hazardous" (tuna, shrimp salad) |
|
|
|
New Mexico | - |
|
|
New York |
|
|
|
North Carolina | Shellfish |
|
|
Crustacea, fresh |
|
|
|
Crustacea, pasteurized |
|
|
|
North Dakota |
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
Oregon | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
Rhode Island | Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
South Carolina | Blue crab, fresh, cooked |
|
|
Blue crab, pasteurized |
|
|
|
Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
|
South Dakota |
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
Texas | Crabmeat |
|
|
Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
|
|
|
Utah |
|
|
|
Vermont |
|
|
|
Virginia |
|
|
|
Washington | Molluscan shellfish (Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen) |
|
|
West Virginia | Deli items (seafood salads) |
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
|
Wyoming |
|
|
|
Contents
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh and frozen fish and cold-smoked fish |
|
|
|
|
Precooked breaded fish |
|
|
|
|
Frozen raw crustaceans |
|
|
|
|
Frozen cooked crustaceans |
|
|
|
|
Cooked, chilled, and frozen crabmeat |
|
|
|
|
Fresh and frozen bivalve molluscs |
|
|
|
|
Plate counts below "m" are considered good quality. Plate counts between "m" and "M" are considered marginally acceptable quality, but can be accepted if the number of samples does not exceed "c." Plate counts at or above "M" are considered unacceptable quality (ICMSF, 1986).
Contents
|
|
|
Min. aw | Reed, 1994 | |
Min. pH | Campanini et al., 1977 | |
Max. pH | Reed, 1994 | |
Max. %NaCl | FDA, 1998b | |
Min. temp. |
|
FDA, 1998b |
Max. temp. |
|
FDA, 1998b |
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Padhye and Doyle, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
Padhye and Doyle, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
Padhye and Doyle, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
Padhye and Doyle, 1992 |
Contents
Contents
Food Sampling and Preparation of Sample Homogenate (Andrews and June, 1998)
The adequacy and condition of the sample or specimen received for examination are of primary importance. If samples are improperly collected and mishandled or are not representative of the sampled lot, the laboratory results will be meaningless. Because interpretations about a large consignment of food are based on a relatively small sample of the lot, established sampling procedures must be applied uniformly. A representative sample is essential when pathogens or toxins are sparsely distributed within the food or when disposal of a food shipment depends on the demonstrated bacterial content in relation to a legal standard.
The number of units that comprise a representative sample from a designated lot of a food product must be statistically significant. The composition and nature of each lot affects the homogeneity and uniformity of the total sample mass. The proper statistical sampling procedure, according to whether the food is solid, semisolid, viscous, or liquid, must be determined by the collector at the time of sampling by using the Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993). Sampling and sample plans are discussed in detail in ICMSF (1986).
Whenever possible, submit samples to the laboratory in the original unopened containers. If products are in bulk or in containers too large for submission to the laboratory, transfer representative portions to sterile containers under aseptic conditions. There can be no compromise in the use of sterile sampling equipment and the use of aseptic technique. Sterilize one-piece stainless steel spoons, forceps, spatulas, and scissors in an autoclave or dry-heat oven. Use of a propane torch or dipping the instrument in alcohol and igniting is dangerous and may be inadequate for sterilizing equipment.
Use containers that are clean, dry, leak-proof, wide-mouthed, sterile, and of a size suitable for samples of the product. Containers such as plastic jars or metal cans that are leak-proof may be hermetically sealed. Whenever possible, avoid glass containers, which may break and contaminate the food product. For dry materials, use sterile metal boxes, cans, bags, or packets with suitable closures. Sterile plastic bags (for dry, unfrozen materials only) or plastic bottles are useful containers for line samples. Take care not to overfill bags or permit puncture by wire closure. Identify each sample unit (defined later) with a properly marked strip of masking tape. Do not use a felt pen on plastic because the ink might penetrate the container. Whenever possible, obtain at least 100 g for each sample unit. Submit open and closed controls of sterile containers with the sample.
Deliver samples to the laboratory promptly with the original storage conditions maintained as nearly as possible. When collecting liquid samples, take an additional sample as a temperature control. Check the temperature of the control sample at the time of collection and on receipt at the laboratory. Make a record for all samples of the times and dates of collection and of arrival at the laboratory. Dry or canned foods that are not perishable and are collected at ambient temperatures need not be refrigerated. Transport frozen or refrigerated products in approved insulated containers of rigid construction so that they will arrive at the laboratory unchanged. Collect frozen samples in pre-chilled containers.
Place containers in a freezer long enough to chill them thoroughly. Keep frozen samples solidly frozen at all times. Cool refrigerated samples, except shellfish and shell stock, in ice at 0-4ºC and transport them in a sample chest with suitable refrigerant capable of maintaining the sample at 0-4ºC until arrival at the laboratory. Do not freeze refrigerated products. Unless otherwise specified, refrigerated samples should not be analyzed more than 36 h after collection. Special conditions apply to the collection and storage of shucked, unfrozen shellfish and shell stock (APHA, 1985). Pack samples of shucked shellfish immediately in crushed ice (no temperature specified) until analyzed; keep shell stock above freezing but below 10ºC. Examine refrigerated shellfish and shell stock within 6 h of collection but in no case more than 24 h after collection. Further details on sample handling and shipment may be found in the Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993) and the Laboratory Procedures Manual (FDA, 1989). The Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993) contains sampling plans for various microorganisms. Some of those commonly used are presented here.
Use aseptic technique when handling product. Before handling or analysis of sample, clean immediate and surrounding work areas. In addition, swab immediate work area with commercial germicidal agent. Preferably, do not thaw frozen samples before analysis. If necessary to temper a frozen sample to obtain an analytical portion, thaw it in the original container or in the container in which it was received in the laboratory. Whenever possible, avoid transferring the sample to a second container for thawing. Normally, a sample can be thawed at 2-5ºC within 18 h. If rapid thawing is desired, thaw the sample at less than 45ºC for not more than 15 min. When thawing a sample at elevated temperatures, agitate the sample continuously in thermostatically controlled water bath.
Various degrees of non-uniform distribution of microorganisms are to be expected in any food sample. To ensure more even distribution, shake liquid samples thoroughly and, if practical, mix dried samples with sterile spoons or other utensils before withdrawing the analytical unit from a sample of 100 g or greater. Use a 50 g analytical unit of liquid or dry food to determine aerobic plate count value and most probable number of coliforms. Other analytical unit sizes (e.g., 25 g for Salmonella) may be recommended, depending on specific analysis to be performed. Use analytical unit size and diluent volume recommended for appropriate Bacteriological Analytical Manual method being used. If contents of package are obviously not homogeneous (e.g., a frozen dinner), macerate entire contents of package and withdraw the analytical unit, or, preferably, analyze each different food portion separately, depending on purpose of test.
Tare high-speed blender jar; then aseptically and accurately (± 0.1 g) weigh unthawed food (if frozen) into jar. If entire sample weighs less than the required amount, weigh portion equivalent to one-half of sample and adjust amount of diluent or broth accordingly. Total volume in blender must completely cover blades.
Contents
Contents
The standard weight of analytical portions of food samples examined for the presence of sanitary and enteropathogenic E. coli is 25 g. If desired, 50 g portions may be used with appropriate scale-up of the suspending medium. See Chapter 9 and current FDA field instructions on sampling and compositing before proceeding with E. coli and coliform analyses (Hitchins et al., 1998).
Gently agitate each gassing LST tube and transfer loopful of suspension to tube of BGLB broth. Hold LST tube at angle and insert loop to avoid transfer of pellicle (if present). Incubate BGLB tubes 48 ± 2 h at 35ºC.
Examine for gas production and record. Calculate most probable number (MPN) (see Chapter 10) of coliforms based on proportion of confirmed gassing LST tubes for 3 consecutive dilutions.
The EC broth MPN method may be used for seawater and shellfish since it conforms to recommended procedures (APHA, 1970).
Contents
This rapid test may be used to enumerate fecal coliforms and as a presumptive test for E. coli in shellfish-growing waters but not, however, in shellfish tissues. Because geographical differences in these waters may affect the efficiency of this test, analysts should compare its results with those of the conventional method before using the A-1 medium method exclusively.
Prepare samples as in presumptive test for coliform bacteria (see C, above). Incubate A-1 medium tubes 3 h at 35 ± 0.5ºC in air incubator. Transfer to water bath and incubate 21 ± 2 h at 44.5 ± 0.2ºC. Maintain water level in bath above level of liquid in inoculated tubes.
Presence of gas in inverted vial or of dissolved gas which can be removed by slight agitation is positive test. Report results as fecal coliform MPN/100 ml sample. NOTE: Fecal coliform counts tend to be greater than E. coli counts since no effort is made to obtain pure cultures and to identify them. Interpretation of data requires understanding of the microflorae of the specimen.
Contents
For microbial quality of bottled water, FDA traditionally follows the guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for E. coli and coliforms in drinking water. EPA's current methodology (EPA, 1989) is based partly on the APHA methodology (APHA, 1989) and partly, for coliforms only, on the Edberg et al. (1989) method. For information on the methodology used by FDA for water, contact A.D. Hitchins, FDA, Division of Microbiological Studies (HFS-516), Washington, DC 20204.
Contents
The official bivalve molluscan FDA procedure for bacteriological analysis of domestic and imported shellfish is fully and properly described only in the 1970 edition of APHA's Recommended Procedures of the Examination of Sea Water and Shellfish (APHA, 1970). Methods, including the conventional 5-tube fecal coliform MPN test, are described for examining shell stock, fresh-shucked meats, fresh-shucked frozen shellfish, and shellfish frozen on the half shell. This procedure does not apply to the examination of crustaceans (crabs, lobsters, and shrimp) or to processed shellfish meats such as breaded, shucked, pre-cooked, and heat-processed products.
Contents
About 94% of E. coli, including many anaerogenic (non-gas-producing) strains, produce the enzyme b -glucuronidase (GUD). Although some shigellae (44%) and salmonellae (29%) also produce GUD, its production by other Enterobacteriaceae is infrequent (Feng and Hartman, 1982). EHEC strains, which are present in about 2% of beef, pork, lamb, and poultry samples, do not produce GUD (Doyle and Schoeni, 1987). The lack of GUD activity in enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 has been used as a selection criterion for this pathogen. Reently, about 34% of human fecal isolates of E. coli were reported to be GUD-negative (Chang et al., 1989). There is evidence, however, that GUD enzyme activity may be under catabolite repression control (Chang et al., 1989) and that the genetic sequences for the GUD enzyme (uidA gene) are present in most GUD-negative E. coli isolates (Bej et al., 1991; Feng et al., 1991).
The LST-MUG assay can presumptively identify E. coli within 24 h (Feng and Hartman, 1982; Moberg et al., 1988). The assay is based on the presence of GUD in E. coli, which cleaves the MUG substrate to release 4-methylumbelliferone (MU). When exposed to longwave (365 nm) UV light, MU exhibits a bluish fluorescence which is easily visualized. When MUG is incorporated into LST medium, coliforms can be enumerated on the basis of gas production from lactose.
E. coli are presumptively identified by fluorescence in the medium under longwave UV light. The LST-MUG method described has been adopted as final action by the AOAC (Moberg et al., 1988).
CAUTION: To observe for fluorescence, examine inoculated LST-MUG tubes under longwave (365 nm) UV light in the dark. A 6-watt hand-held UV lamp is satisfactory and safe. When using a more powerful UV source, such as a 15-watt fluorescent tube lamp, wear protective glasses or goggles (available from laboratory supply houses) if personal exposure exceeds a few minutes a day. Also, examine all glass tubes for fluorescence before use. Cerium oxide, which is sometimes added to glass as a quality control measure, will fluoresce under UV light and interfere with the MUG assay (Hartman, 1989).
NOTE: Some foods, such as shellfish, contain natural GUD activity (Rippey, 1987). In these instances the EC-MUG confirmatory test may be used. Recently, a hydrophobic grid membrane filter/MUG (HGMF/MUG) method for enumeration of total coliform and E. coli in foods was also adopted official first action by the AOAC (Entis, 1989).
Contents
The EC-MUG method (Rippey et al., 1987), uses MUG hydrolysis to detect E. coli (see LST-MUG section for theory and applicability). The very few other bacterial species that can hydrolyze MUG are seldom encountered in shellfish meats. Thus, by including MUG in EC broth at 44.5ºC and examining the incubated EC-MUG tubes for fluorescence under UV irradiation, an E. coli MPN can be readily obtained from a conventional 5-tube fecal coliform MPN determination for shellfish meats. The EC-MUG medium is inoculated from regular LST cultures of shellfish meats.
Contents
These methods are described in the APHA Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods (APHA, 1992) and the AOAC Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC, 1990). Dry Rehydratable Film Method for the Enumeration of Total Coliforms and E. coli. The PetrifilmTM Coliform Count Plate and the PetrifilmTM E. coli Count Plate Methods (AOAC® Official MethodSM 986.33, Bacterial and Coliform Counts in Milk—Dry Rehydratable Film Methods, AOAC® Official MethodSM 989.10, Bacterial and Coliform Counts in Diary Products—Dry Rehydratable Film Methods, and AOAC® Official MethodSM 991.14, Coliform and Escherichia coli Counts in Foods—Dry Rehydratable Film Methods) are described in the APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products and in the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International.
Contents
Contents
Analyze samples promptly after they arrive. Do not freeze. If product is subject to microbiological alteration, refrigerate it before examination. CAUTION: Most pathogenic biotypes lose viability at 6ºC. The approach recommended here permits qualitative determination of the presence of EEC. If enumeration is essential, consider either the dilution endpoint or MPN technique, depending on accuracy required and resources available.
Aseptically weigh 25 g sample into 225 ml BHI broth (see comment on sample size on first page of this chapter). If specimen is a large mass, aseptically cut slices 0.5 cm thick. Incubate 10 min at room temperature with periodic shaking. Decant medium into 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask and incubate 3 h at 35ºC to resuscitate damaged cells. Transfer contents to 225 ml double strength TP broth in 1 liter flask. Incubate 20 h at 44.0 ± 0.2ºC.
Because may species can grow in the enrichment, and non- (or slow) lactose fermenters must be considered, the standard procedure for biochemical and morphological recognition of coliforms described above is inadequate for identifying E. coli. Anaerogenic, nonmotile, slow lactose fermenters may be found in several genera of Enterobacteriaceae. Most tests are performed as described above. Thus, only new or modified reactions are discussed here.
Contents
Because of complex interrelationships among somatic (O), capsular (K, mainly B type), and flagellar (H) antigens and the unknown specificity of sera available commercially, the serological analysis of E. coli is somewhat more difficult than that of other Enterobacteriaceae and should not be attempted on a routine basis. Likewise, virulence cannot be completely correlated with the presence of somatic, capsular, and colonization antigens. If serological identification of an isolate seems advisable, contact specialized laboratories, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Table 14-9. Differentiation of Escherichia species (Ewing, 1986; Kreig and Holt, 1984)
Reaction |
E. coli typical |
E. coli inactivea |
E. hermanii |
E. blattae |
E. fergusoni |
E. vulneris |
IMViC |
++-- |
++-- |
++-- |
-+-± |
-+-- |
-+-- |
KCN |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
Glucose, gas |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Lactose |
+ |
- |
+/- |
- |
- |
+ |
Cellobiose |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
Adonitol |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
|
Mannitol |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+/- |
+ |
Malonate |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+/- |
Table 14-10. Biochemical-physiological behavior of E. coli (Ewing, 1986).
Test |
Reaction |
Nitrate reduction |
+ |
Cytochrome oxidase |
- |
Gram-negative, short rod |
+ |
Fermentative (TSI) |
+ |
Mannitol |
+ |
Lactose |
+ |
Malonate |
- |
H2S |
- |
Urease |
- |
Citrate |
- |
Voges-Proskauer |
- |
Arabinose, acid |
+ |
KCN |
- |
Indole |
+ |
Acetate |
+ |
Adonitol |
- |
Cellobiose |
- |
Glucose, gas |
+ |
ONPG test |
+ |
Mucate |
90% + |
Lysine decarboxylase |
80% + |
Methyl red |
+ |
Table 14-11 lists serogroups and serotypes associated with major pathogenic groups of E. coli. Commercial sera are not available for all these pathogen-associated serogroups (Table 14-12). Along with the symptoms in disease cases, serotyping aids in suggesting which pathogenic attributes to test for, using tests described here or in other chapters.
Table 14-11. Serogroups and serotypes of enterovirulent E. coli isolated from humans with intestinal infections (APHA, 1992)
Pathogenic type |
|
Enteropathogenic (EPEC) |
O18a,18c:H7
O20a,20b:H26 O26:NMa O26:H11 O28a,28c:NM O44:H34 O55:NM O55:H6 O55:H7 O86a:NM O86a:H34 O111a,111b:NM O111a,111b:H2 O111a,111b:H12 O114:H10 O1114:H32 O119:NM O119:H6 O125a,125c:H21 O126:NM O126:H27 O127:NM O127:H9 O127:H21 O128a,128b:H2 O128a,128c:H12 O142:H6 O158:H23 O159 |
Enterotoxigenic (ETEC) |
O6:H16
O8:H9 O11:H27 O15:H11 O20:NM O25:H42 O25:NM O27:H7 O63 O78:H11 O78:H12 O128:H7 O148:H28 O149:H10 O159:H20 O167 |
Enteroinvasive (EIEC) |
O28a,28c:NM
O112a,112c:NM O124:NM O124:H30 O124:H32 O136:NM O143:NM O144:NM O152:NM O167:H4 O167:5 |
Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) | O157:H7 (and O26, O111, O113, O145, and O157:H-serogroups of-EPEC) |
Table 14-12. E. coli O-serogroups recognizable with commercially available sera (APHA, 1992)
EPEC |
ETEC |
EIEC |
A-D EHEC groupa |
O26:K60
O86:K61 O18:K77 O55:K59 O119:K69 O20:K61 O111:K58 O124:K72 O20:K84 O127:K63 O125:K70 O28:K73 O126:K71 O44:K74 O128:K67 O112:K66 |
O6
|
O28:K73
O112:K66 O124:K72 O143:Kb O114:Kc |
O157:H7
O1 O2 O3 O4 |
Contents
A tissue culture (HeLa cell) test (Mehlman et al., 1977) is available to screen isolates for invasive potential before confirming invasiveness by the Sereny test. An in vitro staining technique using acridine orange to stain for intracellular (invasive) bacteria in HeLa cell monolayers is also an effective assay to determine invasiveness of pathogenic E. coli (Miliotis, 1991; Miliotis and Feng, 1993).
Examine animals daily for 5 d. A positive reaction is development of conjunctivitis ulceration (keratoconjunctivitis) and opacity in eye treated with bacteria, but not in control eye. Observation by veterinarian is advisable for differentiation of keratoconjunctivitis and conjunctivitis. Confirm by demonstrating intracellular location of bacteria in corneal epithelial cells, using May-Grunwald and Giemsa stains. Recovery of same culture from viruses, fungi, chlamydia, mycoplasma, and other bacteria. Consider bacteria invasive if test is positive in at least 2 of 3 trials.
Contents
ETEC strains produce two types of toxins: heat-labile toxin (LT) and heat-stable toxin (ST). LT can be detected by the Y-l tissue culture test (see below), and ST can be detected by the infant mouse test (see below). These toxins also can be detected by ELISA, and genes coding for them can be detected by gene probes (FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 24).
The validity of this method was established in a collaborative study (Lovett and Peeler, 1984). LT, which stimulates the enzyme adenylate cyclase with the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, is closely related to V. cholerae enterotoxin (CT) in molecular structure and mode of action. In this assay system, LT promotes conversion of elongated fibroblast-like cells into round, refractile cells.
The validity of this method was demonstrated in a collaborative study (Lovett and Peeler, 1984).
Virulence prerequisites for enterotoxigenic strains of E. coli include the ability to attach to the jejunal lining, to proliferate in situ, and to elaborate one or more toxins. Host specificity is manifested by possession of unique colonization factors, including antigens and lectins. At least 3 factors have been elucidated in strains of human significance: CFA I, CFA II, and 8755. Several types of mammalian cells have been proposed to show colonization: buccal, FLOW 11000, and HeLa.
Contents
Enterohemorrhagic E. coli was first recognized as an important food-borne pathogen in 1982 (Riley et al., 1983). The organism causes hemorrhagic colitis (Riley et al., 1983), which has characteristic symptoms of bloody diarrhea and abdominal cramps; however, it may progress into hemolytic uremic syndrome (Karmali et al., 1983), a more severe complication that can result in kidney failure and death. Although there are many serotypes of EHEC, serotype O157:H7 has been most frequently implicated in food-borne diseases. In 1993, isolates of O157:H7 serotype caused numerous food-borne outbreaks, including a major outbreak in Washington state that infected about 500 persons. Most outbreaks of O157:H7 infections are caused by the consumption of contaminated ground beef; however, raw milk and other foods have also been implicated.
Several microbiological methods can be used to isolate E. coli O157:H7 from foods. Unlike typical E. coli, isolates of O157:H7 do not ferment sorbitol and are negative with the MUG assay; therefore, these criteria are commonly used for selective isolation. Sorbitol-MacConkey agar has been used extensively to isolate this organism from clinical specimens. Hemorrhagic colitis agar, a selective and differential medium, is used in a direct plating method to isolate O157:H7 from foods. A third procedure uses Sorbitol-MacConkey medium containing potassium tellurite and Cefixime. It includes an enrichment step and is a new method developed as result of the recent food-borne outbreaks. This procedure has been highly effective in isolating O157:H7 from a variety of commonly contaminated foods (Weagant et al., 1995).
Homogenize 10 g of sample in 90 ml peptone water (R56) diluent. Prepare serial tenfold dilutions in peptone water diluent in accordance with anticipated level of contamination. Pipet 0.1 ml of each dilution in duplicate onto dried surface of SMAC (M139) agar and spread evenly across each plate. Incubate plates at 35ºC and read after 18 h. Sorbitol-negative colonies are pale compared to bright pink sorbitol-positive colonies produced by E. coli and other enterics. As further confirmation, sorbitol-negative colonies can be tested for GUD activity by spotting culture on HC agar (with MUG; M62) and used to select for MUG-negative colonies (Doyle and Schoeni, 1987; Scotland et al., 1991). For definitive identification of O157:H7 serotype, test sorbitol-negative, MUG-negative colonies for agglutination with O157 and H7 antisera. CAUTION: high levels of contaminating coliforms in the sample may mask the presence of O157:H7 strains in this medium. Furthermore, isolates of Escherichia hermanii and other enterics may show similar biochemical phenotypes on SMAC and along with Citrobacter freundii may also agglutinate O157 antiserum; therefore, they may cause false-positive identifications (Bettelheim et al., 1993; Lior and Borczyk, 1987).
Strains of O157:H7 may also be isolated from foods using the HC agar (M62). Because this medium contains sorbitol and the MUG reagent, distinguishing phenotypes based on reactions to these reagents can be determined simultaneously in the same medium. The fluorescence from the MUG reaction, however, is diffusible and may spread throughout the entire plate during extended incubation. A colorimetric substrate BCIG may also be used in HC agar instead of MUG (Okrend et al., 1990). If low levels of O157:H7 are suspected, the food may be enriched first in modified trypticase soy broth (mTSB) (M156) containing novobiocin before it is plated on selective medium. Sorbitol-negative, MUG-negative colonies isolated on HC medium must be confirmed serologically with O157 and H7 antisera. The colonies may also be transferred to membranes for colony hybridization analysis for the presence of Shiga-like toxin genes. The procedures for isolation using HC agar and for enrichment in mTSB are described in Chapter 24, Identification of Food-borne Bacterial Pathogens by Gene Probes (FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th Edition, 1998). CAUTION: Normal flora in foods may also proliferate in the mTSB enrichment medium and cause overgrowth or masking of O157:H7 colonies on the HC agar medium.
An enrichment/isolation procedure using the TC SMAC medium was recently introduced for detecting O157:H7 in foods. Both the enrichment and the selective media contain several antibiotics which effectively suppress the growth of normal flora. Comparative analysis of the TC SMAC procedure with the HC agar method using a variety of naturally contaminated and seeded foods showed that the TC SMAC procedure was superior to the HC agar method in the recovery of O157:H7 bacteria (Weagant et al., 1995). CAUTION: Although most E. coli are sorbitol fermenters, about 6% of the isolates will not ferment sorbitol. These atypical strains may be found in foods and will appear identical to O157:H7 colonies on the TC SMAC agar. The inclusion of MUG assay in the analysis procedure should distinguish these atypical E. coli strains from the O157:H7 isolates. For additional information on the TC SMAC procedure, contact Steve Weagant, FDA, Bothell, WA (206) 483-4874.
EHEC Enrichment Broth (EEB) - same as mTSB (M156) but with the following filter-sterilized antibiotics added after autoclaving:
Cefixime 0.05 mg/liter*
Cefsulodin 10.00 mg/liter
Vancomycin 8.00 mg/liter
TC SMAC - Sorbitol-MacConkey agar (M139) with the following filter- sterilized additives after autoclaving and tempering:
Potassium tellurite 2.50 mg/liter
Cefixime 0.05 mg/liter*
*Available from Dynal Inc., Lake Success, NY (800) 638-9416.
As an alternative to serological typing, isolates of serotype O157:H7 may also be identified by using the serotype-specific DNA probe, PF-27. This 18-base oligonucleotide probe, developed at CFSAN, is directed at a unique region of the uidA gene in the O157:H7 isolate. Colony hybridization analysis of 280 bacterial isolates, including E. coli, several pathogenic enteric species, other Shiga-like toxin-producing EHEC and 42 isolates of O157:H7 implicated in a recent food-borne outbreak, showed that PF-27 is highly specific only for the isolates of O157:H7 serotype (Feng, 1993). For more information on PF-27, contact Peter Feng, CFSAN, FDA, Washington, DC. Phone (202) 205-4518. For protocols on using the probe, see FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 24.
Contents
EHEC isolates produce several toxins, but only a few have been well characterized. The major toxin is virtually identical to the Shiga toxin of Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and hence named Shiga-like toxin I (SLT-I). Another toxin, although only 60% homologous to SLT-I has been designated SLT-II. Since both toxins are cytotoxic to HeLa and Vero tissue culture cells, they are also known as verotoxin (VT) I and II. The toxins produced by EHEC are detected by tissue culture assays. However, DNA probe and polymerase chain reaction assays have also been developed to detect the presence of SLT gene in EHEC isolates.
Equipment and materials
Media and reagents
Preparation of cytotoxin-VT
Inoculate culture into 20 ml trypticase soy broth (TSB) in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask and incubate with agitation at 37ºC for 20-24 h. Centrifuge culture at 7000 x g for 30 min to sediment bacteria. Filter supernatant through 0.45 µm membrane to remove residual bacteria. Store at 4ºC. Dilute filtrate 1:5 in DPBS, pH 7.0, before use.
Preparation of Vero monolayers
Maintain Vero culture in MEME-L15 medium containing 2% milk serum, prepared as follows: Add dry milk to double distilled water to final concentration of 10%. Add concentrate of gentamicin sulfate to level of 50 µg/ml. Stir 1 h on magnetic stirrer at room temperature. With stirring, adjust pH to 4.5 with 1 N HCl. Filter through cheesecloth. Clarify by centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 15 min. Filter again through cheesecloth. Sterilize by filtration through 0.22 µm membrane. Add milk serum to give 2% concentration by volume in MEME-L15 medium. Incubate culture in 5% CO2 incubator held at 36ºC for 72 h. Examine culture for purity and appearance of cells. If cells are normal and not contaminated, treat with trypsin to remove monolayer. Suspend cells to density of 10 per ml in growth medium. With gentle agitation transfer 0.5 ml portions to 16 mm wells in sterile plastic dishes. Incubate 3-4 d at 36ºC in CO2 incubator. Examine for purity and appearance of cells. Remove spent medium and replace with 0.5 ml fresh medium.
The toxigenic potential of EHEC isolates may be determined by colony hybridization using oligonucleotide DNA probes that are specific for the genes that encode for SLT-I and SLT-II toxins. However, numerous other serotypes of EHEC also produce SLT. Therefore, serological or other assays are still required to identify isolates of O157:H7 serotype. For more information on these SLT probes, contact William L. Payne, CFSAN, FDA, Washington, DC, phone (202) 205-4361. For protocols on using the probes, see FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 24.
In addition to probes, two different sets of PCR primers specific for SLT genes have been developed at FDA, Bothell, WA, and at CFSAN. These primers can be used to determine potential toxigenicity of EHEC isolates. Both sets of primers have been tested extensively on reference and outbreak strains of EHEC and confirmed to be very effective. For more information on these SLT primers and for PCR methods and protocols see Weagant, S.D., J.L. Bryant, and K.G. Jinneman. 1995. An improved rapid technique for isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from foods. J. Food Prot. 58:7-12.; refer to FDA publication LIB 3811, Sept., 1993; or contact Walter E. Hill, SPRC, FDA, Bothell, WA, phone (206) 402-3176; or William L. Payne, CFSAN, FDA, Washington, DC, phone (202) 205-4361. Recently, a multiplex PCR procedure which can simultaneously identify the O157:H7 serotype as well as the toxin type has been developed at CFSAN and is currently under evaluation. For more information, contact Peter Feng, CFSAN, FDA, Washington, DC, phone (202) 205-4518.
CAUTION: Unlike the tissue culture assays which detect the toxins, reactivity of an EHEC isolate with SLT probes or with PCR primers merely indicates that genetic sequences for the toxins are present in that particular isolate. It does not, however, indicate that the toxins are actually produced.
Contents
Enterovirulent E. coli strains that do not type as EHEC, EIEC, or ETEC strains are probably enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) strains, e.g., classical infantile diarrhea strains. Although there are no specific tests for EPEC strains, some methods, which are still experimental, are available (see the review by Doyle and Padhye (1989). Confirmation of a putative EPEC strain involves serogrouping and serotyping (Table 14-12) and consideration of case symptomology. Further complexity concerns the fact that some EPEC strains behave like EHEC strains (see Tables 14-1 and 14-11).
Contents
Contents
Test Kit |
Analytical Technique |
Approx. Total Test Time1 |
Supplier |
3MTM PetrifilmTME. coli Count Plate2 |
An indicator of glucuronidase activity |
24-48 h |
3M Microbiology Products |
ColiComplete2 [Confirms total coliforms and E. coli] |
Substrate supporting disc |
48 h for coliforms
|
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
ColiConfirm [Confirms presence of coliforms] |
Substrate supporting disc |
48 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
Coliforms2 |
Culture |
24 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC Contact: Robert Steinhauser 4230 East Towne Blvd., Suite 191 Madison, WI 53704 Phone: 608/825-6125 E-mail: bsteinha@contam-sci.com Web: www.contam-sci.com |
ColiGel |
Selective media, color indicator for galactosidase production (coliforms), UV fluorescence (E. coli) |
28 h (coliforms) |
Charm Sciences, Inc. Web: www.charm.com |
Colilert®2 |
Selective media with color indicator (UV light for E. coli) |
24 h |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Web: www.idexx.com/fed/home/start.asp |
E*Colite |
Selective media, color indicator for galactosidase production (coliforms) UV fluorescence (E. coli) |
28 h (coliforms) |
Charm Sciences, Inc. Web: www.charm.com |
ISO-GRID Method for Confirmed Coliform Count using LMG Agar2 |
Membrane filtration with selective and differential culture medium based on lactose fermentation |
24 h |
QA Life Sciences, Inc. |
PathoGelTM |
Selective media, color indicator for galactosidase production (coliforms) UV fluorescence (E. coli), black precipitate (H2S production) |
28 h (coliforms) |
Charm Sciences, Inc. Web: www.charm.com
|
RCTTM Rapid Coliform Test |
Redox reaction and color change |
14 h |
Applied Research Institute
Web: www.arillc.com |
SimPlateTM for Total Coliform and E. coli |
MPN plate with selective media (UV light for E. coli) |
24 h |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Web: www.idexx.com/fed/home/start.asp |
Total coliform/E. coli (estimated) |
Selective media with color indicator that changes based on approximate coliform count (UV light for E. coli) |
30 min for 108 |
Contamination Sciences LLC
Contact: Robert Steinhauser 4230 East Towne Blvd., Suite 191 Madison, WI 53704 Phone: 608/825-6125 E-mail: bsteinha@contam-sci.com Web: www.contam-sci.com |
Table 14-14. Commercial test products for E. coli
Test Kit |
Analytical Technique |
Approx. Total Test Time1 |
Supplier |
3MTM PetrifilmTME. coli Count Plate2 |
An indicator of glucuronidase activity |
24-48 h |
3M Microbiology Products |
CHECK 3 E. coli |
Chemical, visual detection |
4-18 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC |
Coli ST EIA:ETC STA (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd). |
EIA |
18½ h |
Oxoid, Inc. |
ColiComplete2 [Confirms total coliforms and E. coli] |
Substrate supporting disc |
30 h for E. coli 48 h for coliforms |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
ColiGel |
Selective media, color indicator for galactosidase production (coliforms), UV fluorescence (E. coli) |
28 h (coliforms) |
Charm Sciences, Inc. Web: www.charm.com |
Colilert®2 |
Selective media with color indicator (UV light for E. coli) |
24 h |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Web: www.idexx.com/fed/home/start.asp |
E. coli 2 |
Culture |
24 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC Web: www.contam-sci.com |
E. coli Detection Test |
Antibody-dye conjugate complex |
6 h |
Morningstar Diagnostics, Inc. web: www.mstarusa.com |
E. coli Shiga-like toxins I & II |
Antibody-dye conjugate complex |
18-24 h |
Morningstar Diagnostics, Inc. web: www.mstarusa.com |
E*Colite |
Selective media, color indicator for galactosidase production (coliforms) UV fluorescence (E. coli) |
28 h (coliforms) |
Charm Sciences, Inc. Web: www.charm.com |
GENE-TRAK E. coli Assay |
Nucleic acid hybridization |
28 h |
GENE-TRAK Systems |
ISO-GRID Method for Confirmed E. coli Count using LMG Agar and BMA Agar2 |
Membrane filtration with selective and differential culture medium based on lactose fermentation and b -glucuronidase |
24 h |
QA Life Sciences, Inc. |
PathoGelTM |
Selective media, color indicator for galactosidase production (coliforms) UV fluorescence (E. coli), black precipitate (H2S production) |
28 h (coliforms) |
Charm Sciences, Inc. Web: www.charm.com |
SimPlateTM for Total Coliform and E. coli |
MPN plate with selective media (UV light for E. coli) |
24 h |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Web: www.idexx.com/fed/home/start.asp |
Total coliform/E. coli (estimated) |
Selective media with color indicator that changes based on approximate coliform count (UV light for E. coli) |
30 min for 108 |
Contamination Sciences LLC Web: www.contam-sci.com |
VET-RPLA |
Reversed passive latex agglutination |
|
Oxoid, Inc. |
Table 14-15. Commercial test products for E. coli O157:H7
Test Kit |
Analytical Technique |
Approx. Total Test Time1 |
Supplier |
Assurance EHEC EIA |
Enzyme immunoassay |
19½ h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
BAX® for Screening/E. coli O157:H7 |
Polymerase chain reaction |
21-24 h |
Qualicon, Inc. Web: www.qualicon.com |
Dynabeads® anti-E. coli 0157 |
Immunomagnetic separation |
24 h |
Dynal Inc. Contact: Technical Service Web: www.dynal.no |
E. coli O157:H72 |
Culture |
24 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC Web: www.contam-sci.com |
E. coli O157 Antigen Detection Test |
Antibody-dye conjugate complex |
7 h |
Morningstar Diagnostics, Inc. web: www.mstarusa.com |
E. coli O157 Antigen Detection Test |
Antibody-dye conjugate complex |
18 h |
Morningstar Diagnostics, Inc. web: www.mstarusa.com |
E. coli 0157 Latex Test |
|
|
Oxoid, Inc. |
eclipseTM E. coli O157:H7 Rapid Color Change Test |
Immunoassay |
8.33 or 20.33 h |
Eichrom Technologies, Inc. Web: www.eichrom.com |
EHEC-TekTM for E. coli O157:H7 in Foods |
Magnetic capture and concentration/ELISA |
24 h |
Organon Teknika Corp. |
EIAFoss E. coli 0157 |
Combination ELISA and Immuno Magnetic Separation |
22-24 h |
Foss North America, Inc. 7682 Executive Dr. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 612/974-9892 E-mail: sales@fossnorthamerica.com Web: www.fossnorthamerica.com |
ImmunoCard Stat! E. coli O157:H7 |
Immunoassay using colloidal gold |
8-24 h |
Meridian Diagnostics |
ISO-GRID Method for E. coli O157:H7 Enumeration using SD-39 Agar |
Membrane filtration with selective and differential culture medium based on lysine decarboxylase, sorbitol fermentation and b-glucuronidase |
24-48 h (24 h for presumptive enumeration and 24 h additional to confirm presumptive positive results) |
QA Life Sciences, Inc. |
NOW [for rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7] |
Antibody |
9 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC Web: www.contam-sci.com |
PATH-STICK One Step Rapid E. coli O157 Test |
Immunochromatography |
16-24 h |
Celsis, Inc. Web: www.celsis.com |
Premier E. coli O157 |
ELISA |
19 h |
Meridian Diagnostics |
Probelia PCR System |
Polymerase chain reaction |
24 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
Reveal® Microbial Screening Test for E. coli O157:H7 |
Sandwich ELISA |
8 h |
Neogen Corporation Web: www.neogen.com |
RIDASCREEN Verotoxin |
ELISA |
10-18 h |
Lionheart Diagnostics |
TECRA E. coli O157 VIA [Used to detect E. coli 0157 including E. coli O157:H7] |
ELISA |
20 h |
International BioProducts Web: www.intlbioproducts.com |
Transia Card E. coli O157 |
Immunoassay reaction |
24½ h |
GENE-TRAK Systems |
VIDAS ECO |
Enzyme linked fluorescent assay |
24 h |
bioMérieux Inc. Contact: bioMérieux Industry 595 Anglum Rd. Hazelwood, MO 63042 Phone: 314/731-8500 E-mail: usa@na.biomerieux.com Web: www.biomerieux.com |
VIDAS ICE [Used to detect E. coli O157] |
Immunoconcentration |
24 h |
bioMérieux Inc. Contact: bioMérieux Industry 595 Anglum Rd. Hazelwood, MO 63042 Phone: 314/731-8500 E-mail: usa@na.biomerieux.com Web: www.biomerieux.com |
VIP for EHEC2 [Used to detect E. coli O157:H7] |
Lateral Flow Immunoassay |
18 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
VTEC-RPLA TD960 |
Reversed passive latex agglutination |
48 h (bacterial culture) |
Oxoid, Inc. |
Table 14-16. Commercial test products for E. coli enterotoxin
Test Kit |
Analytical Technique |
Approx. Total Test Time1 |
Supplier |
VET-RPLA TD920 |
Reversed passive latex agglutination |
24 h (bacterial culture) |
Oxoid, Inc. |
Contents
Andrews, W.H., and June, G.A. 1998. Food sampling and preparation of sample homogenate, Ch. 1. In Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. (revision A), (CD-ROM version). R.L. Merker (Ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995a. Bacteria and coliform counts in dairy products: Dry rehydratable film methods. Sec. 17.3.03, Method 989.10. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 12. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995b. Bacterial and coliform counts in milk: Dry rehydratable film methods. Sec. 17.3.02, Method 986.33. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 12. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995c. Coliform and Escherichia coli counts in foods: Dry rehydratable film methods. Sec. 17.3.04, Method 991.14. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 13-15. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995d. Coliforms in dairy products: Pectin gel method. Sec. 17.3.01, Method 989.11. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 11-12. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995e. Confirmed total coliform and E. coli in all foods: Substrate supporting disc method. Sec. 17.3.07, Method 992.30. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 17-18. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995f Detection of Escherichia coli producing heat-labile enterotoxin: DNA colony hybridization method. Sec. 17.4.03, Method 984.34. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 24-27. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995g. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: DNA colony hybridization method using synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides and paper filters. Sec. 17.4.04, Method 986.34. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 27-31. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995h. Escherichia coli enterotoxins: Mouse adrenal cell and suckling mouse assays. Sec. 17.4.05, Method 984.35. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 31-32. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995i. Escherichia coli in chilled or frozen foods: Fluorogenic assay for glucuronidase. Sec. 17.4.01, Method 988.19. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 21-22. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995j. Fecal coliforms in shellfish growing waters: Medium A-1 method. Sec. 17.3.05, Method 978.23. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 15. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995k. Invasiveness of mammalian cells by Escherichia coli: Microbiological method. Sec. 17.4.02, Method 982.36. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 22-24. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995l. Total coliform and Escherichia coli counts in foods: Hydrophobic grid membrane filter/MUG method. Sec. 17.3.09, Method 990.11. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 20-21. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995m. Total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water: Defined substrate technology method. Sec. 17.3.06, Method 991.15. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 15-17. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC, 1995n. Total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and Escherichia coli in foods: Hydrophobic grid membrane filter method. Sec. 17.3.08, Method 983.25. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 18-20. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
APHA. 1970. Recommended Procedures for the Examination of Seawater and Shellfish, 4th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
APHA. 1985a. Laboratory Procedures for the Examination of Seawater and Shellfish, 5th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
APHA. 1985b. Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 15th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
APHA. 1989. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
APHA. 1992. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 3rd ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
Bej, A.K., J.L. Dicesare, L. Haff, and R.M. Atlas. 1991. Detection of Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. in water by using the polymerase chain reaction and gene probes for uid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:1013-1017
Bettelheim, K.A., H. Evangelidis, J.L. Pearce, E. Sowers, and N.A. Stockbine. 1993. Isolation of Citrobacter freundii strain which carries the Escherichia coli O157 antigen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:760-761.
Campanini, M., Casolari, A., and Gola, S. 1977. Bacterial Growth and limiting pH. Industria Conserve, 52(4):326-331.
Chang, G.W., J. Brill, and R. Lum. 1989. Proportion of beta-glucuronidase-negative Escherichia coli in human fecal samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:335-339.
Dean, A.G., Y. Ching, R.G. Williams, and L.B. Harden. 1972. Test for Escherichia coli enterotoxin using infant mice. Application in a study of diarrhea in children in Honolulu. J. Infect. Dis. 125:407-411.
Doyle, M.P., and V.V. Padhye. 1989. Escherichia coli. In Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. M.P. Doyle (Ed), p. 236-281. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Doyle, M.P., and J.L. Schoeni. 1987. Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from retail meats and poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2394-2396.
DuPont, H.L., S.B. Formal, R.B. Hornick, J.J. Snyder, J.P. Libonati, D.G. Sheahan, E.H. LaBrec, and J.P. Kalas. 1971. Pathogenesis of Escherichia coli diarrhea. N. Engl. J. Med. 285:1-11.
Edberg, S.C., M.J. Allen, D.B. Smith, and the National Collaborative Study. 1989. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: Comparison with presence-absence techniques. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 551:1003-1008.
Entis, P. 1989. Hydrophobic grid membrane filter/MUG method for total coliform and Escherichia coli enumeration in foods: collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 72:936-950.
EPA. 1989. Drinking water; national primary drinking water regulations; total coliforms (including fecal coliforms and E. coli); Environmental Protection Agency, final rule. Federal Register. 54:27544-27568.
Ewing, W.H. 1986. Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, 4th ed. Elsevier, New York.
FDA. 1996a. Raw breaded shrimp -- Microbiological criteria for evaluating compliance with current good manufacturing practice regulations (CPG 7108.25) Section 540.420. Compliance Policy Guides, (August 1996 edition), updated through October 31, 1996. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration.
FDA. 1996b. Crabmeat – Fresh and Frozen – Adulteration with Filth, Involving the Presence of the Organism Escherichia coli (CPG 7108.02) Section 540.275. Compliance Policy Guides, (August 1996 edition), updated through October 31, 1996. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration.
FDA. 1998a. FDA & EPA Guidance Levels. Appendix 5. In Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guide, 2nd ed., p. 245-248. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Seafood, Washington, DC.
FDA. 1998b. Bacterial pathogen growth. Appendix 4. In Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guide, 2nd ed., p. 241-244. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Seafood, Washington, DC.
Feng, P. 1993. Identification of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 by DNA probe specific for an allele of uidA gene. Mol. Cell. Probes 7:151-154.
Feng, P.C.S., and P.A. Hartman. 1982. Fluorogenic assays for immediate confirmation of Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43:1320-1329.
Feng, P., R. Lum, and G. Chang. 1991. Identification of uidA gene sequences in beta-D-glucuronidase (-) Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:320-323.
Greenberg, A.E. and Hunt, D.A. (Eds.) 1985. Laboratory Procedures for the Examination Of Seawater and Shellfish, 5th ed. The American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Hartman, P.A. 1989. The MUG (glucuronidase) test for Escherichia coli in food and water. In Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology and Immunology. A. Balows, R.C. Tilton, and A. Turano (Eds.), p. 290-308. Brixia Academic Press, Brescia, Italy.
Hartman, P.A., and P.S. Hartman. 1976. Coliform analyses at 30C. J. Milk Food Technol. 39:762-767.
Hitchins, A.D., Feng, P., Watkins, W.D., Rippey, S.R., and Chandler, L.A. 1998. Escherichia coli and the coliform bacteria. Ch. 4. In Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. (revision A), (CD-ROM version). R.L. Merker (Ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
ICMSF. 1986. Microorganisms in Foods. 2. Sampling for microbiological analysis: Principles and specific applications, 2nd ed. University of Toronto Press, Buffalo, NY.
Jay, J.M. 1978. Modern Food Microbiology, 2nd Ed.D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.
Karmali, M.A., B.T. Steele, M. Petric, and C. Lim. 1983. Sporadic cases of hemolytic-uremic syndrome associated with faecal cytotoxin and cytotoxin producing Escherichia coli in stools. Lancet 1:619-620.
Kreig, N.R., and J.G. Holt (Eds.). 1984. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
Levine, M.M. 1987. Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea: enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteroadherent. J. Infect. Dis. 155:377-389.
Lior, H., and A.A. Borczyk. 1987. False positive identification of Escherichia coli O157. Lancet i:333.
Lovett, J., and J.T. Peeler. 1984. Detection of Escherichia coli enterotoxins by using mouse adrenal cell and suckling mouse assays: collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 67:946-949.
March, S.B., and S. Ratnam. 1986. Sorbitol-MacConkey medium for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with hemorrhagic colitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:869-872.
Marshall, R.T., R.A. Case, R.E. Ginn, J.W. Messer, J.T. Peeler, C.H. Richardson, and H.M. Wehr. 1987. Update on standard methods for the examination of dairy products, 15th ed. J. Food Prot. 50:711-714.
Mehlman, I.J., E.L. Eide, A.C. Sanders, M. Fishbein, and C. Aulisio. 1977. Methodology for recognition of invasive potential of Escherichia coli. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 66:546-562.
Merker, R.L. (Ed.). 1998. Media and Reagents, Appendix 3. In Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. (revision A), (CD-ROM version). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
Miliotis, M.D. 1991. Acridine orange stain for determining intracellular enteropathogens in HeLa cells. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:830-832.
Miliotis, M.D., and P. Feng. 1993. In vitro staining technique for determining invasiveness in foodborne pathogens. FDA Laboratory Information Bulletin, March, 9(3):3754.
Moberg, L.J., M.K. Wagner, and L.A. Kellen. 1988. Fluorogenic assay for rapid detection of Escherichia coli in chilled and frozen foods: collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 71:589-602.
NFI. 1998. State Guidelines for coliforms, fecal coliforna, and E. coli. National Fisheries Institute, Arlington, VA.
Okrend, A.J.G., B.E. Rose, and C.P. Lattuada. 1990. Use of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoxyl-ß-D-glucuronide in MacConkey sorbitol agar to aid in the isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from ground beef. J. Food Prot. 53:941-943.
Padhye, N.V. and Doyle, M.P. 1992. Escherichia coli O157:H7: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and methods for detection in foods. J. Food Protect. 55(7):555-565.
Paille, D., Hackney, C., Reily, L, Cole, M., and Kilgen, M. 1987. Seasonal variation in the fecal coliform population of Louisiana oysters and its relationship to microbiological quality. J. Food Protect. 50(7):545-549.
Reed, G.H. 1994. Foodborne illness (part 8): Escherichia coli. Dairy, Food and Environmental San. 14(6):329-330.
Riley, L.W., R.S. Remis, S.D. Helgerson, H.B. McGee, B.R. Davis, R.J. Herbert, E.S. Olcott, L.M. Johnson, N.J. Hargrett, P.A. Blake, and M.L. Cohen. 1983. Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype. N. Engl. J. Med. 308:681-685.
Rippey, S.R., L.A. Chandler, and W.D. Watkins. 1987. Fluorometric method for enumeration of Escherichia coli in molluscan shellfish. J. Food Prot. 50:685-690, 710.
Sack, D.A., and R.B. Sack. 1975. Test for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli using Y-1 adrenal cells in miniature. Infect. Immun. 11:334-336.
Scotland, S.M., T. Cheasty, A. Thomas, and B. Rowe. 1991. Beta-glucuronidase activity of vero cytotoxinproducing strains of Escherichia coli, including serogroup O157, isolated in the United Kingdom. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 13:42-44.
Sereny, B. 1957. Experimental keratoconjunctivitis in shigellosa. Acta Microbiol. Hung. 4:367.
Szabo, R.A., E.C.D. Todd, and A. Jean. 1986. Method to isolate Escherichia coli O157:H7 from food. J. Food Prot. 49:768-772.
Ward, D., Bernard, D., Collette, R., Kraemer, D., Hart, K., Price, R., and Otwell, S. (Eds.) 1997. Hazards Found in Seafoods, Appendix III. In HACCP: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Training Curriculum, 2nd ed., p. 173-188. UNC-SG-96-02. North Carolina Sea Grant, Raleigh, NC.
Weagant, S.D., J.L. Bryant, and K.G. Jinneman. 1995. An improved rapid technique for isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from foods. J. Food Prot. 58:7-12.