Contents
Salmonella is a rod-shaped, motile bacterium -nonmotile exceptions S. gallinarum and S. pullorum-, nonsporeforming and Gram-negative. There is a widespread occurrence in animals, especially in poultry and swine. Environmental sources of the organism include water, soil, insects, factory surfaces, kitchen surfaces, animal feces, raw meats, raw poultry, and raw seafoods, to name only a few.
S.typhi and the paratyphoid bacteria normally cause septicemia and produce typhoid or typhoid-like fever in humans. Other forms of salmonellosis generally produce milder symptoms.
Acute symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea, fever, and headache. Chronic consequences include arthritic symptoms that may follow 3 - 4 weeks after onset of acute symptoms. Onset of the illness is usually 6 - 48 h. The infective dose is as few as 15–20 cells; depends upon age and health of host, and strain differences among the members of the genus. Acute symptoms may last for 1 to 2 d or may be prolonged, again depending on host factors, ingested dose, and strain characteristics.
The disease is caused by penetration and passage of Salmonella organisms from gut lumen into epithelium of small intestine where inflammation occurs; there is evidence that an enterotoxin may be produced, perhaps within the enterocyte. Foods commonly associated with the disease include raw meats, poultry, eggs, milk and dairy products, fish, shrimp, frog legs, yeast, coconut, sauces and salad dressing, cake mixes, cream-filled desserts and toppings, dried gelatin, peanut butter, cocoa, and chocolate.
Various Salmonella species have long been isolated from the outside of egg shells. The present situation with S. enteritidis is complicated by the presence of the organism inside the egg, in the yolk. This and other information strongly suggest vertical transmission, i.e., deposition of the organism in the yolk by an infected layer hen prior to shell deposition. Foods other than eggs have also caused outbreaks of S. enteritidis disease (FDA, 1998a).
Contents
Hazards from Salmonella can be prevented by: heating seafood sufficiently to kill the bacteria (e.g., 24 s at 165ºF), holding chilled seafood below 4.4ºC (40ºF), preventing post-cooking cross-contamination and prohibiting people who are ill or are carriers of Salmonella from working in food operations. (Ward et al., 1997).
Contents
Product |
n1 |
c2 |
Bacteria/gram or cm2 |
|
m3 |
M4 |
|||
Fresh and frozen fish and cold-smoked fish |
5 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Frozen raw crustaceans |
5 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Frozen cooked crustaceans |
10 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Fresh and frozen bivalve molluscs |
20 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Plate counts below "m" are considered good quality. Plate counts between "m" and "M" are considered marginally acceptable quality, but can be accepted if the number of samples does not exceed "c." Plate counts at or above "M" are considered unacceptable quality (ICMSF, 1986).
Contents
Product |
Guideline |
Reference |
All fish |
Presence of Salmonella species |
FDA, 1998b |
Contents
State |
Products |
Maximum Salmonella |
Alabama |
- |
- |
Alaska |
- |
- |
Arizona |
- |
- |
Arkansas |
- |
- |
California |
- |
- |
Colorado |
- |
- |
Connecticut |
- |
- |
Delaware |
- |
- |
Florida |
- |
- |
Georgia |
- |
- |
Hawaii |
- |
- |
Idaho |
- |
- |
Illinois |
- |
- |
Indiana |
- |
- |
Iowa |
- |
- |
Kansas |
- |
- |
Kentucky |
- |
- |
Louisiana |
- |
- |
Maine |
- |
- |
Maryland |
- |
- |
Massachusetts |
- |
- |
Michigan |
- |
- |
Minnesota |
- |
- |
Mississippi |
Oysters, clams, and mussels - fresh and frozen |
0 |
Missouri |
- |
- |
Montana |
- |
- |
Nebraska |
Oysters, clams, mussels, fresh or frozen |
0 |
|
Deli foods (shrimp salad, etc.) |
0 |
Nevada |
- |
- |
New Hampshire |
- |
- |
New Jersey |
"Potentially hazardous" (tuna, shrimp salad) |
0 |
New Mexico |
- |
- |
New York |
- |
- |
North Carolina |
- |
- |
North Dakota |
- |
- |
Ohio |
- |
- |
Oklahoma |
- |
- |
Oregon |
- |
- |
Pennsylvania |
- |
- |
Rhode Island |
- |
- |
South Carolina |
- |
- |
South Dakota |
- |
- |
Tennessee |
- |
- |
Texas |
- |
- |
Utah |
- |
- |
Vermont |
- |
- |
Virginia |
- |
- |
Washington |
- |
- |
West Virginia |
- |
- |
Wisconsin |
- |
- |
Wyoming |
- |
- |
Contents
Parameter |
Values Reported |
Reference |
Min. aw |
|
FDA, 1998c |
Min. pH |
|
Campanini et al., 1977 |
Max. pH |
|
Holley and Proulx, 1986 |
Max. %NaCl |
|
Prost and Riemann, 1967 |
Min. temp. |
5.2ºC (41.4ºF) |
FDA, 1998c |
Max. temp. |
46.2ºC (115.2ºF) |
Reed, 1993 |
Contents
Temp. |
D-Value |
Medium |
Reference |
||
(ºC) |
(ºF) |
(min.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sucrose soln. |
Goepfert et al., 1970 |
|
|
|
|
0.5% NaCl |
Thomas et al., 1966 |
|
|
|
|
Pea soup |
Thomas et al., 1966 |
|
|
|
|
Egg, pH 8.0 |
Anellis et al., 1954 |
|
|
|
|
Egg, pH 5.5 |
Anellis et al., 1954 |
|
|
|
|
Skim milk |
Thomas et al., 1966 |
Contents
Contents
The adequacy and condition of the sample or specimen received for examination are of primary importance. If samples are improperly collected and mishandled or are not representative of the sampled lot, the laboratory results will be meaningless. Because interpretations about a large consignment of food are based on a relatively small sample of the lot, established sampling procedures must be applied uniformly. A representative sample is essential when pathogens or toxins are sparsely distributed within the food or when disposal of a food shipment depends on the demonstrated bacterial content in relation to a legal standard.
The number of units that comprise a representative sample from a designated lot of a food product must be statistically significant. The composition and nature of each lot affects the homogeneity and uniformity of the total sample mass. The proper statistical sampling procedure, according to whether the food is solid, semisolid, viscous, or liquid, must be determined by the collector at the time of sampling by using the Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993). Sampling and sample plans are discussed in detail in ICMSF (1986).
Whenever possible, submit samples to the laboratory in the original unopened containers. If products are in bulk or in containers too large for submission to the laboratory, transfer representative portions to sterile containers under aseptic conditions. There can be no compromise in the use of sterile sampling equipment and the use of aseptic technique. Sterilize one-piece stainless steel spoons, forceps, spatulas, and scissors in an autoclave or dry-heat oven. Use of a propane torch or dipping the instrument in alcohol and igniting is dangerous and may be inadequate for sterilizing equipment.
Use containers that are clean, dry, leak-proof, wide-mouthed, sterile, and of a size suitable for samples of the product. Containers such as plastic jars or metal cans that are leak-proof may be hermetically sealed. Whenever possible, avoid glass containers, which may break and contaminate the food product. For dry materials, use sterile metal boxes, cans, bags, or packets with suitable closures. Sterile plastic bags (for dry, unfrozen materials only) or plastic bottles are useful containers for line samples. Take care not to overfill bags or permit puncture by wire closure. Identify each sample unit (defined later) with a properly marked strip of masking tape. Do not use a felt pen on plastic because the ink might penetrate the container. Whenever possible, obtain at least 100 g for each sample unit. Submit open and closed controls of sterile containers with the sample.
Deliver samples to the laboratory promptly with the original storage conditions maintained as nearly as possible. When collecting liquid samples, take an additional sample as a temperature control. Check the temperature of the control sample at the time of collection and on receipt at the laboratory. Make a record for all samples of the times and dates of collection and of arrival at the laboratory. Dry or canned foods that are not perishable and are collected at ambient temperatures need not be refrigerated. Transport frozen or refrigerated products in approved insulated containers of rigid construction so that they will arrive at the laboratory unchanged. Collect frozen samples in pre-chilled containers.
Place containers in a freezer long enough to chill them thoroughly. Keep frozen samples solidly frozen at all times. Cool refrigerated samples, except shellfish and shell stock, in ice at 0-4ºC and transport them in a sample chest with suitable refrigerant capable of maintaining the sample at 0-4ºC until arrival at the laboratory. Do not freeze refrigerated products. Unless otherwise specified, refrigerated samples should not be analyzed more than 36 h after collection. Special conditions apply to the collection and storage of shucked, unfrozen shellfish and shell stock (APHA, 1985). Pack samples of shucked shellfish immediately in crushed ice (no temperature specified) until analyzed; keep shell stock above freezing but below 10ºC. Examine refrigerated shellfish and shell stock within 6 h of collection but in no case more than 24 h after collection. Further details on sample handling and shipment may be found in the Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993) and the Laboratory Procedures Manual (FDA, 1989). The Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993) contains sampling plans for various microorganisms. Some of those commonly used are presented here.
Because of the continuing occurrence of Salmonella in foods, sampling plans for these organisms have received the attention of committees of national and international organizations (ICMSF, 1986; NAS, 1969). Each of these committees has recommended varying the number of samples from a particular lot of food according to the sampling category to which a food is assigned. Generally, the assignment to a sampling or food category depends on 1) the sensitivity of the consumer group (e.g., the aged, the infirm, and infants); 2) the possibility that the food may have undergone a step lethal to Salmonella during the manufacturing process or in the home; and 3) the history of the food. The selection of a sampling plan depends mainly on the first 2 criteria cited. The history of the food would be important in deciding whether to sample, i.e., whether there was a past history of contamination. For the Salmonella sampling plan discussed here, 3 categories of foods are identified.
Food Category I. - Foods that would not normally be subjected to a process lethal to Salmonella between the time of sampling and consumption and are intended for consumption by the aged, the infirm, and infants.
Food Category II. - Foods that would not normally be subjected to a process lethal to Salmonella between the time of sampling and consumption.
Food Category III. - Foods that would normally be subjected to a process lethal to Salmonella between the time of sampling and consumption.
This sampling plan applies to the collection of finished products under surveillance and/or for determination of compliance for regulatory consideration. It also applies to the collection of factory samples of raw materials in identifiable lots of processed units and/or finished products where regulatory action is possible. It does not apply to the collection of in-line process sample units at various stages of manufacture since those samples do not necessarily represent the entire lot of food under production. The actual techniques involved in sampling are covered in the Investigations Operation Manual (FDA, 1993).
A sample unit consists of a minimum of 100 g and is usually a consumer-size container of product. Take sample units at random to ensure that a sample is representative of the lot. When using sample containers, submit a control consisting of one empty sample container that has been exposed to the same conditions as those under which the sample was collected. Collect more than one sample unit from large institutional or bulk containers when the number of sample units required exceeds the number of containers in the lot. A sample unit will consist of more than one container when containers are smaller than 100 g (e.g., four 25 g containers could constitute a sample unit).
The numbers of sample units to be collected in each food category are as follows: Food Category I, 60 sample units; Food Category II, 30 sample units; Food Category III, 15 sample units. Submit all samples collected to the laboratory for analysis. Advise the laboratory in advance of perishable sample shipments.
The laboratory will analyze each sample for the presence of Salmonella according to methods described in this manual, or in Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC, 1995d). Take a 25 g analytical unit at random from each 100 g sample unit. When a sample unit consists of more than one container, aseptically mix the contents of each container before taking the 25 g analytical unit. To reduce the analytical workload, the analytical units may be composited. The maximum size of a composite unit is 375 g or 15 analytical units. The minimum number of composite units to be tested for each food category is as follows: Food Category I, 4 composite units; Food Category II, 2 composite units; Food Category III, one composite unit. For each 375 g composite, the entire amount of 375 g is analyzed for Salmonella.
Keep the remainder of the sample unit in a sterile container for compliance requirements as per section 702(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as amended through February, 1993. Refrigerate perishable samples and samples supporting microbial growth. An analytical control is required for each sample tested. The sampled lot is acceptable only if analyses of all composite units are negative for Salmonella. If one or more composite units are positive for Salmonella, the lot is rejected, provided that the analytical control is negative for Salmonella. A lot will not be resampled unless the environmental control for Salmonella is positive. For all samples positive for Salmonella, determine the somatic group. See Andrews et al. (1998) for information on further handling of these cultures. Recommendations for regulatory action may be based on the identification of the Salmonella somatic group and will not require definitive serotyping before initiation of regulatory action.
Food Category II. - Foods that would not normally be subjected to a process lethal to Salmonella between the time of sampling and consumption. Examples are as follows:
Industry Product Code
2 Milled grain products not cooked before consumption (bran and wheat germ)
3 Bread, rolls, buns, sugared breads, crackers, custard- and cream-filled sweet goods, and icings
5 Breakfast cereals and other ready-to-eat breakfast foods
7 Pretzels, chips, and other snack foods
9 Butter and butter products, pasteurized milk and raw fluid milk and fluid milk products for direct consumption, pasteurized and unpasteurized concentrated liquid milk products for direct consumption, dried milk and dried milk products for direct consumption, casein, sodium caseinate, and whey
12 Cheese and cheese products
13 Ice cream from pasteurized milk and related products that have been pasteurized, raw ice cream mix and related unpasteurized products for direct consumption
14 Pasteurized and unpasteurized imitation dairy products for direct consumption
15 Pasteurized eggs and egg products from pasteurized eggs, unpasteurized eggs and egg products from unpasteurized eggs for consumption without further cooking
16 Canned and cured fish, vertebrates, and other fish products; fresh and frozen raw shellfish and crustacean products for direct consumption; smoked fish, shellfish, and crustaceans for direct consumption
17 Meat and meat products, poultry and poultry products, and gelatin (flavored and unflavored bulk)
20-22 Fresh, frozen, and canned fruits and juices, concentrates, and nectars; dried fruits for direct consumption; jams, jellies, preserves, and butters
23 Nuts, nut products, edible seeds, and edible seed products for direct consumption
24 Vegetable juices, vegetable sprouts, and vegetables normally eaten raw
26 Oils consumed directly without further processing; oleomargarine
27 Dressings and condiments (including mayonnaise), salad dressing, and vinegar
28 Spices, flavors, and extracts
29 Soft drinks and water
30 Beverage bases
31 Coffee and tea
33 Candy (with and without chocolate; with and without nuts) and chewing gum
34 Chocolate and cocoa products
35 Pudding mixes not cooked before consumption, and gelatin products
36 Syrups, sugars, and honey
37 Ready-to-eat sandwiches, stews, gravies, and sauces
38 Soups
39 Prepared salads
54 Nutrient supplements, such as vitamins, minerals, proteins, and dried inactive yeast
Food Category III: Foods that would normally be subjected to a process lethal to Salmonella between the time of sampling and consumption. Examples are as follows:
Industry Product Code
2 Whole grain, milled grain products that are cooked before consumption (corn meal and all types of flour), and starch products for human use
3 Prepared dry mixes for cakes, cookies, breads, and rolls
4 Macaroni and noodle products
16 Fresh and frozen fish; vertebrates (except those eaten raw); fresh and frozen shellfish and crustaceans (except raw shellfish and crustaceans for direct consumption); other aquatic animals (including frog legs, marine snails, and squid)
18 Vegetable protein products (simulated meats) normally cooked before consumption
24 Fresh vegetables, frozen vegetables, dried vegetables, cured and processed vegetable products normally cooked before consumption
26 Vegetable oils, oil stock, and vegetable shortening
35 Dry dessert mixes, pudding mixes, and rennet products that are cooked before consumption
Use aseptic technique when handling product. Before handling or analysis of sample, clean immediate and surrounding work areas. In addition, swab immediate work area with commercial germicidal agent. Preferably, do not thaw frozen samples before analysis. If necessary to temper a frozen sample to obtain an analytical portion, thaw it in the original container or in the container in which it was received in the laboratory. Whenever possible, avoid transferring the sample to a second container for thawing. Normally, a sample can be thawed at 2-5ºC within 18 h. If rapid thawing is desired, thaw the sample at less than 45ºC for not more than 15 min. When thawing a sample at elevated temperatures, agitate the sample continuously in thermostatically controlled water bath.
Various degrees of non-uniform distribution of microorganisms are to be expected in any food sample. To ensure more even distribution, shake liquid samples thoroughly and, if practical, mix dried samples with sterile spoons or other utensils before withdrawing the analytical unit from a sample of 100 g or greater. Use a 50 g analytical unit of liquid or dry food to determine aerobic plate count value and most probable number of coliforms. Other analytical unit sizes (e.g., 25 g for Salmonella) may be recommended, depending on specific analysis to be performed. Use analytical unit size and diluent volume recommended for appropriate Bacteriological Analytical Manual method being used. If contents of package are obviously not homogeneous (e.g., a frozen dinner), macerate entire contents of package and withdraw the analytical unit, or, preferably, analyze each different food portion separately, depending on purpose of test.
Tare high-speed blender jar; then aseptically and accurately (± 0.1 g) weigh unthawed food (if frozen) into jar. If entire sample weighs less than the required amount, weigh portion equivalent to one-half of sample and adjust amount of diluent or broth accordingly. Total volume in blender must completely cover blades.
Contents
Several changes were introduced in the 8th edition (revision A) of the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (Merker, 1998). The first change involved the expanded use of Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium. In the previous edition, RV medium was recommended only for the analysis of shrimp. Based on the completion of AOAC precollaborative (June et al., 1995) and collaborative (in review) studies, RV medium is now recommended for the analysis of raw flesh foods, highly contaminated foods, and animal feeds. With supporting data, RV medium will eventually replace selenite cystine broth for the analysis of all foods. Tetrathionate (TT) broth will continue to be used as the second selective enrichment broth. However, TT broth is to be incubated at 43ºC for the analysis of raw flesh foods, highly contaminated foods, and animal feeds, and at 35ºC for the analysis of all other food types.
The second change involved the option of refrigerating incubated preenrichments and selective enrichments of low-moisture foods for up to 72 h. With this option, sample analyses can be initiated as late as Wednesday or Thursday without weekend work being involved.
The third change involved reducing the period of incubation of the lysine iron agar (LIA) slants. In the former edition (BAM-7), triple sugar iron agar (TSI) and LIA slants were incubated at 35ºC for 24 ± 2 h and 48 ± 2 h, respectively. Unpublished data have demonstrated that the 48 h reading of LIA slants is without diagnostic value. Of 193 LIA slants examined, all gave definitive results within 24 ± 2 h of incubation. No significant changes altered the final test result when the slants were incubated an additional 24 h. Thus, both the TSI and LIA slants are now incubated for 24 ± 2 h.
The fourth change involved the procedure for surface disinfection of shell eggs. In the previous edition (BAM-7), egg shells were surface-disinfected by soaking in 0.1% mercuric chloride solution for 1 h followed by soaking in 70% ethanol for 30 min. Mercuric chloride is classified as a hazardous waste, and is expensive to dispose of according to Environmental Protection Agency guidelines. In this edition, egg shells are now surface-disinfected by soaking for 30 min in a 200 ppm Cl solution containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate.
A method for the analysis of guar gum has been included. When guar gum is preenriched at a 1:9 sample/broth ratio, a highly viscous, and nonpipettable mixture results. Addition of the enzyme cellulase to the preenrichment medium, however, results in a readily pipettable mixture. The effectiveness of this procedure for the analysis of other types of thickening agents is currently under investigation.
The directions for picking colonies from the selective plating agars have been made more explicit to reflect the intent of the method. In the absence of typical or suspect colonies on the selective plating agars, it is recommended that atypical colonies be picked to TSI and LIA slants. This recommendation is based on the fact that up to 4% of all Salmonella cultures isolated by FDA analysts from certain foods, especially seafoods, during the past several years have been atypical.
Finally, since the publication of BAM-7, a 6-way comparison was conducted of the relative effectiveness of the three selective plating agars recommended in the BAM (bismuth sulfite, Hektoen enteric, and xylose lysine desoxycholate agars) and three relatively new agars (EF-18, xylose lysine Tergitol 4, and Rambach agars). FDA studies (in press) indicated no advantage in replacing any of the BAM-recommended agars with one or more of the newer agars. Thus, the combination of selective plating agars recommended in BAM-7 remains unchanged.
For preparation of media and reagents, refer to secs 967.25-967.28 in Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC, 1995a).
Adjust pH, if necessary, to 6.8 ± 0.2 with sterile 1 N NaOH or 1 N HCl. Cap jar securely and mix well before determining final pH. Loosen jar cap about 1/4 turn and incubate 24 ± 2 h at 35ºC.
Continue as in 4, a-k, below.
Aseptically weigh 25 g sample into sterile blending container. Add 225 ml sterile lactose broth and blend 2 min. Aseptically transfer homogenized mixture to sterile, wide-mouth, screw-cap jar (500 ml) or other appropriate container and let stand 60 min at room temperature with jar securely capped. Mix well by swirling and determine pH with test paper. Adjust pH, if necessary, to 6.8 ± 0.2. Mix well and loosen jar cap about 1/4 turn. Incubate 24 ± 2 h at 35ºC. Continue as in 4, a-k, below.
Mix well by swirling and determine pH with test paper. Adjust pH, if necessary, to 6.8 ± 0.2. Add up to 2.25 ml steamed (15 min) Tergitol Anionic 7 and mix well. Alternatively, use steamed (15 min) Triton X-100. Limit use of these surfactants to minimum quantity needed to initiate foaming. Actual quantity will depend on composition of test material. Surfactants will not be needed in analysis of powdered glandular products. Loosen jar caps 1/4 turn and incubate sample mixtures 24 ± 2 h at 35ºC. Continue as in 4, a-k, below.
Raw flesh foods, highly contaminated foods, and animal feeds. Transfer 0.1 ml mixture to 10 ml Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium and another 1 ml mixture to 10 ml tetrathionate (TT) broth.
Other foods. Transfer 1 ml mixture to 10 ml selenite cystine (SC) broth and another 1 ml mixture to 10 ml TT broth.
Raw flesh foods, highly contaminated foods, and animal feeds. Incubate RV medium 24 ± 2 h at 42 ± 0.2ºC (water bath). Incubate TT broth 24 ± 2 h at 43 ± 0.2ºC (water bath).
Other foods. Incubate SC and TT broths 24 ± 2 h at 35ºC.
Typical Salmonella Colony Morphology
Pick 2 or more colonies of Salmonella from each selective agar after 24 ± 2 h incubation. Typical Salmonella colonies are as follows:
If typical colonies are present on the BS agar after 24 ± 2 h incubation, then pick 2 or more colonies. Irrespective of whether or not BS agar plates are picked at 24 ± 2 h, reincubate BS agar plates an additional 24 ± 2 h. After 48 ± 2 h incubation, pick 2 or more typical colonies, if present, from the BS agar plates, only if colonies picked from the BS agar plates incubated for 24 ± 2 h give atypical reactions in triple sugar iron agar (TSI) and lysine iron agar (LIA) that result in culture being discarded as not being Salmonella. See sections 4-i and 4-j, below, for details in interpreting TSI and LIA reactions.
Atypical Salmonella Colony Morphology
In the absence of typical or suspicious Salmonella colonies, search for atypical Salmonella colonies as follows:
HE and XLD agars. Atypically a few Salmonella cultures produce yellow colonies with or without black centers on HE and XLD agars. In the absence of typical Salmonella colonies on HE or XLD agars after 24 ± 2 h incubation, then pick 2 or more atypical Salmonella colonies.
BS agar. Atypically some strains produce green colonies with little or no darkening of the surrounding medium. If typical or suspicious colonies are not present on BS agar after 24 ± 2 h, then do not pick any colonies but reincubate an additional 24 ± 2 h. If typical or suspicious colonies are not present after 48 ± 2 h incubation, then pick 2 or more atypical colonies.
Suggested Control Cultures
In addition to the positive control cultures (typical Salmonella), 3 additional Salmonella cultures are recommended to assist in the selection of atypical Salmonella colony morphology on selective agars. These cultures are a lactose-positive, H2S-positive S. arizonae (ATCC 12325) and a lactose-negative, H2S-negative S. abortus equi (ATCC 9842); OR a lactose-positive, H2S-negative S. diarizonae (ATCC 29934). These cultures may be obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, 12301 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, MD 20852-1776.
Positive--agglutination in test mixture and no agglutination in control.
Negative--no agglutination in test mixture and no agglutination in control.
Nonspecific--agglutination in both test mixture and control. Test the cultures giving such results with Spicer-Edwards antisera.
Add 0.2-0.3 ml Kovacs' reagent. Most Salmonella cultures give negative test (lack of deep red color at surface of broth). Record intermediate shades of orange and pink as ±.
Positive--agglutination in test mixture; no agglutination in saline control.
Negative--no agglutination in test mixture; no agglutination in saline control.
Nonspecific--agglutination in test and in control mixtures. Perform further biochemical and serological tests as described in Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae (Ewing, 1986).
Test or substrate |
Result |
Salmonella species reactiona |
|
Positive |
Negative |
||
1. Glucose (TSI) |
Yellow butt |
Red butt |
+ |
2. Lysine decarboxylase (LIA) |
Purple butt |
Yellow butt |
+ |
3. H2S (TSI and LIA) |
blackening |
no blackening |
+ |
4. Urease |
purple-red color |
no color change |
- |
5. Lysine decarboxylase broth |
purple color |
yellow color |
+ |
6. Phenol red dulcitol broth |
yellow color and/or gas |
no gas; no color change |
+b |
7. KCN broth |
growth |
no growth |
- |
8. Malonate broth |
blue color |
no color change |
-c |
9. Indole test |
violet color at surface |
yellow color at surface |
- |
10. Polyvalent flagellar test |
agglutination |
no agglutination |
+ |
11. Polyvalent somatic test |
agglutination |
no agglutination |
+ |
12. Phenol red lactose broth |
yellow color and/or gas |
no gas; no color change |
-c |
13. Phenol red sucrose broth |
yellow color and/or gas |
no gas; no color change |
- |
14. Voges-Proskauer test |
pink-to-red color |
no color change |
- |
15. Methyl red test |
diffuse red color |
diffuse yellow color |
+ |
16. Simmons citrate |
growth; blue color |
no growth; no color change |
v |
Perform the following additional tests on cultures that do not give typical Salmonella reactions for tests 1-11 in Table 17-6 and that consequently do not classify as Salmonella.
Positive--acid production (yellow) and gas production in inner fermentation vial. Consider production of acid only as positive reaction. Most cultures of Salmonella give negative test result, indicated by no gas formation in inner fermentation vial and red (with phenol red as indicator) or purple (with bromcresol purple as indicator) throughout medium.
Positive--presence of growth, usually accompanied by color change from green to blue. Most cultures of Salmonella are citrate-positive.
Negative--no growth or very little growth and no color change.
Discard, as not Salmonella, cultures that give results listed in any subdivision of Table 17-7. Perform additional tests described in Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae (Ewing, 1986) to classify any culture that is not clearly identified as Salmonella by classification scheme in Table 17-6 or not eliminated as not being Salmonella by test reactions in Table 17-7. If neither of 2 TSI cultures carried through biochemical tests confirms the isolate as Salmonella, perform biochemical tests, beginning with 5-e, on remaining urease-negative TSI cultures from same 25 g analytical unit.
Table 17-7. Criteria for discarding non-Salmonella cultures.
Test or substrate |
Results |
1. Urease |
positive (purple-red color) |
2. Indole test and
Polyvalent flagellar (H) test; or Indole test and
|
positive (violet color at surface)
positive (violet color at surface)
|
3. Lysine decarboxylase and
|
negative (yellow color)
|
4. Phenol red lactose broth |
positive (yellow color and/or gas) a,b |
5. Phenol red sucrose broth |
positive (yellow color and/or gas)b |
6. KCN broth,
|
positive (growth)
|
Inoculate each unit according to sec. 978.24 (API 20E, Enterotube II, and Enterobacteriaceae II), sec. 989.12 (MICRO-ID), and sec. 991.13 (Vitek GNI in Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC, 1995a), incubating for time and temperature specified. Add reagents, observe, and record results. For presumptive identification, classify cultures, according to (AOAC, 1995a), above, as Salmonella or not Salmonella.
For confirmation of cultures presumptively identified as Salmonella, perform the Salmonella serological somatic (O) test (5-f, above) and the Salmonella serological flagellar (H) test (5-c, above) or the Spicer-Edwards flagellar (H) test (5-d, above), and classify cultures according to the following guidelines:
Several rapid screening methods for the isolation of Salmonella from foods have been adopted as official methods by AOAC International. These methods are also recognized by the FDA as satisfactory alternatives to the conventional culture method. It should be emphasized, however, that positive results with these screening methods are considered presumptive and must be confirmed by the conventional culture method described in this chapter. Negative results obtained with these rapid methods are considered definitive. The rapid methods approved by AOAC International through the Official Methods Program appear in Table 17-8.
Table 17-8. Rapid methods approved by AOAC for detection of Salmonella
Rapid screening method |
Manufacturer |
AOAC Official Methods of Analysis section numbera |
|
Generic name |
Trade name |
||
Fluorescent antibody |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
975.54 |
Hydrophobic grid membrane filter |
ISO-GRID |
QA Laboratories Ltd.
|
99l.12 |
DNA hybridization enzyme immunoassay |
GENE-TRAK |
GENE-TRAK Systems, Inc.
|
990.13 |
Colorimetric monoclonal |
Salmonella -Tek |
Organon Teknika Corp.
100 Akzo Avenue Durham, NC 27704 |
986.35, 987.11, and 993.08 |
Colorimetric polyclonal enzyme immunoassay |
TECRA Salmonella Visual Immunoassayb |
Bioenterprises Pty Ltd,
|
989.14 |
|
Assurance Salmonella Enzyme Immunoassay |
BioControl Systems, Inc.
|
992.11 |
Immunodiffusion |
1-2 TEST |
BioControl Systems, Inc.
|
989.13 |
Automated conductance |
Malthus Microbial Detection System |
Malthus Instruments, LTD
|
991.38 |
Contents
Contents
Table 17-9. Commercial test products for Salmonella.
Test Kit |
Analytical Technique |
Approx. Total Test Time1 |
Supplier |
1-2 Test2 |
Immunodiffusion |
36 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
Assurance Gold Salmonella EIA |
Enzyme immunoassay |
29.5 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
Assurance Salmonella EIA2 |
Enzyme immunoassay |
48 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
BAX® for Screening/Salmonella2 |
Polymerase chain reaction |
26-30 h |
Qualicon, Inc. Web: www.qualicon.com |
Bind® Salmonella2 |
Bacteriophage with gene for ice crystal proteins and indicator dye |
22 h |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Web: www.idexx.com/fed/home/start.asp |
CHECK 3 Salmonella |
Chemical, visual detection |
4-18 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC Web: www.contam-sci.com |
CheckPoint Colony Lift Immunoassay Kit for Presumptive Detection of Group D Salmonella |
Colony lift immunoassay |
15-18 h |
Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc. Web: www.kpl.com |
Dynabeads® anti-Salmonella2 |
Immunomagnetic separation |
48 or 72 h |
Dynal Inc. Web: www.dynal.no |
EIAFoss Salmonella2 |
Combination ELISA and immunomagnetic separation |
22-24 h |
Foss North America, Inc.
Web: www.fossnorthamerica.com |
GENE-TRAK Salmonella Assay2 |
Nucleic acid hybridization |
48 h |
GENE-TRAK Systems |
ISO-GRID Method for Salmonella Detection using EF-18 Agar2 |
Enrichment followed by membrane filtration with selective and differential culture medium based on lysine decarboxylase and sucrose fermentation |
42-72 h (42-48 h for negative screen and 24 h additional to confirm presumptive positive result) |
QA Life Sciences, Inc. |
Oxoid Salmonella Latex Test2 |
Polyvalent latex agglutination |
42 h |
Oxoid, Inc. |
Oxoid Salmonella Rapid Test2 |
Rapid differential culture with serological confirmation |
42 h |
Oxoid, Inc. |
PATH-STICK One Step Rapid Salmonella Test |
Immunochromatography |
38 to 56 h |
Celsis, Inc. Web: www.celsis.com |
Probelia PCR System |
Polymerase chain reaction |
22 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
Reveal® Microbial Screening Test for Salmonella2 |
Sandwich ELISA |
21 h |
Neogen Corporation Web: www.neogen.com |
Salmonella2 |
Culture |
48 h |
Contamination Sciences LLC Web: www.contam-sci.com |
Salmonella Antigen Detection Test |
Antibody-dye conjugate complex |
20-48 h |
Morningstar Diagnostics, Inc. Web: www.mstarus.com |
GENE-TRAK Salmonella DLP2 |
Nucleic acid hybridization |
48 h |
GENE-TRAK Systems |
Salmonella Screen/Salmonella Verify2 |
Immunomagnetic separation |
24 h |
Vicam, L.P. Web: www.vicam.com |
Salmonella Screen/SE Verify2 |
Immunomagnetic separation |
24 h |
Vicam, L.P. Web: www.vicam.com |
Salmonella-TekTM 24-Hour Method2 |
Bead immunocapture |
24 h |
Organon Teknika Corp. |
Salmonella-TekTM 48-Hour Method2 |
ELISA |
48 h |
Organon Teknika Corp. |
TECRA Salmonella Immunocapture |
Immunocapture prior to using TECRA SALM VIA |
24 h |
International BioProducts Web: intlbioproducts.com |
TECRA Salmonella Unique 2 |
Immunoenrichment/ ELISA |
22 h |
International BioProducts Web: intlbioproducts.com |
TECRA Salmonella Visual Immunoassay2 |
ELISA |
48 h |
International BioProducts Web: intlbioproducts.com |
Vidas ICS |
Immunoconcentration |
24 h |
bioMérieux Inc. Web: www.biomerieux.com |
Vidas SLM2 |
Enzyme linked fluorescent assay |
48 h |
bioMérieux Inc. Web: www.biomerieux.com |
VIP for Salmonella [Detects Salmonella spp.] |
Lateral flow immunoassay |
28 h |
BioControl Systems, Inc. Web: www.rapidmethods.com |
Contents
Andrews, W.H., Hammack, T.S., and Amaguana, R.M. 1998. Salmonella. . In Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. (revision A), (CD-ROM version). R.L. Merker (Ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
Andrews, W.H., and June, G.A. 1998. Food sampling and preparation of sample homogenate, Ch. 1. In Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. (revision A), (CD-ROM version). R.L. Merker (Ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
Anellis, A., Lubas, J., and Rayman, M.M. 1954. Heat resistance in liquid eggs of some strains of the genus Salmonella.377-395.
AOAC. 1995a. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), Secs. 967.25-967.28, 978.29, 989.12, 991.13, and 994.04. AOAC International, Arlington, VA.
AOAC. 1995b. Motile and non-motile Salmonella in foods: Polyclonal enzyme immunoassay method. Sec. 17.9.14, Method 992.11. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 80-81. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995c. Motile Salmonella in all foods: Immunodiffusion (1-2 test) method. Sec. 17.9.18, Method 989.13. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 90-91. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995d. Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other enterobacteriaceae in foods: Biochemical system identification (Vitek GNI) screening method. Sec. 17.9.06, Method 991.13. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 64-66. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995e. Salmonella in cocoa and chocolate: Motility enrichment on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) medium. Sec. 17.9.19, Method 993.13. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 91-92. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995f. Salmonella in dried milk products: Motility enrichment on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) Medium. Sec. 33.5.13, Method 995.07. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995g. Salmonella in dry foods: Refrigerated preenrichment and selective enrichment broth culture methods. Sec. 17.9.21, Method 994.04. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 94-94A. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995h. Salmonella in foods: Automated conductance method. Sec. 17.9.20, Method 991.38. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 92-94. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995i. Salmonella in foods: Colorimetric deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization method (GENE-TRAK). Sec. 17.9.17, Method 990.13. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 87-89. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995j. Salmonella in foods: Colorimetric monoclonal EIA (Salmonella-tek) screening method. Sec. 17.9.10, Method 986.35. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 71-74. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995k. Salmonella in foods: Colorimetric monoclonal enzyme immunoassay (Salmonella Tek). Sec. 17.9.12, Method 993.08. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 75-77. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995l. Salmonella in foods: Colorimetric polyclonal enzyme immunoassay screening method. Sec. 17.9.13, Method 989.14. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 77-80. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995m. Salmonella in foods: Detection. Sec. 17.9.02, Method 967.26. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 58-59. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995n. Salmonella in foods: DNA hybridization screening method. Sec. 17.9.16, Method 987.10. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 84-86. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995o. Salmonella in foods: Fluorescent antibody (FA) screening method. Sec. 17.9.08, Method 975.54. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 67-69. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995p. Salmonella in foods: Fluorogenic and colorimetric monoclonal enzyme immunoassay (Q-Trol) screening methods. Sec. 17.9.15, Method 989.15. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 81-84. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995q. Salmonella in foods: Hydrophobic grid membrane filter (Iso-grid) screening method. Sec. 17.9.09, Method 991.12. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 69-71. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995r. Salmonella in foods: Identification. Sec. 17.9.03, Method 967.27. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 59-62. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995s. Salmonella in foods: Preparation of culture media and reagents. Sec. 17.9.01, Method 967.25. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 55-58. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995t. Salmonella in foods: Serological tests. Sec. 17.9.07, Method 967.28. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 66-67. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995u. Salmonella in low-moisture foods: colorimetric monoclonal EIA (Salmonella-Tek) screening method. Sec. 17.9.11, Method 987.11. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 74-75. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995v. Salmonella in raw, highly contaminated foods and animal feeds, detection. Sec. 17.9.22, Method 995.20. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995w. Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and other enterobacteriaceae in foods: Biochemical identification kit method. Sec. 17.9.05, Method 989.12. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 63-64. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
AOAC. 1995x. Salmonella spp. in foods: Biochemical identification kit method. Sec. 17.9.04, Method 978.24. In Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed., P.A. Cunniff (Ed.), p. 62-63. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
Campanini, M., Casolari, A., and Gola, S. 1977. Bacterial Growth and limiting pH. Industria Conserve, 52(4):326-331.
Ewing, W.H. 1986. Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriacae, 4th ed. Elsevier, New York.
FDA. 1998a. Salmonella. In The "Bad Bug Book," Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins Handbook, Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Washington, DC.
FDA. 1998b. Appendix 5: FDA & EPA Guidance Levels. In Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards & Controls Guide, 2nd ed. p. 246. Office of Seafood, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administartion, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. FDA. 1998c. Appendix 4: Bacterial Pathogen Growth. In Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards & Controls Guide, 2nd ed. p. 242. Office of Seafood, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administartion, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Federal Register. 1971. 36(93):8815 (secs d, e, and f).
Federal Register. 1972. 37(191):20556 (sec. 173.388(a)).
Goepfert, J.M., Iskander, I.K., and Anderson, C.H. 1970. Relation of the heat resistance of Salmonellae to the water activity of the environment. Appl. Microbiol. 19:429-433.
Holley, R.A. and Proulx, M. 1986. Use of egg washwater pH to prevent survival of Salmonella at moderate temperatures. Poultry Sci. 65:922-928.
ICMSF. 1986. Microorganisms in Foods. 2. Sampling For Microbiological Analysis: Principles and Specific Applications, 2nd ed. University of Toronto Press, Buffalo, NY.
June, G.A., P.S. Sherrod, T.S. Hammack, R.M. Amaguana, and W.H. Andrews. 1995. Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth tetrathionate broth, and Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the recovery of Salmonella from raw flesh and other highly contaminated foods: Precollaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 78:375-380.
Prost, E. and Riemann, H. 1967. Food-borne salmonellosis. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 21:495-528.
Reed, G.H. 1993. Foodborne illness (part 2): Salmonellosis. Dairy, Food and Environmental San. 13(12):706.
Thomas, C.T., White, J.C., and Longrée. 1966. Thermal resistance of Salmonellae and staphylococci in foods. Appl. Microbiol. 14:815-820.0
Ward, D. and Hart, Kathy. 1997. HACCP: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Training Cirriculum. p. 168. Publication UNC-SG-96-02, North Carolina Sea Grant, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC.