| ||
Resources Nutrition Research Fuelling YOUR Sport Hot Topics Supplements Q&A Page More About Us Nutrition Home
|
Peak Performance: training
and nutritional strategies for sport Chapter 14: Eating for recovery 14 Eating for recovery
Eating for recovery 'I like to get replenishment in the first half hour after my race with high carbohydrate drinks and foods. Especially when I have a busy program with more than one race each night. I have to fit in swim downs, massage, drug tests, the next race, coaches, the media. It can be frantic. I have my own supplies organised—a sports drink, bananas, or something sweet.'
'My team has discovered that it's important to ingest a small amount of carbohydrates, usually by eating a bowl of cereal, immediately following the race. This is quite a change from the traditional approach in cycling, in which riders were told not to eat anything until many hours after . . . supposedly to allow their bodies to recuperate before ingesting. In fact, they were losing four hours of precious glycogen storage time.'
The finish line has been crossed, the final whistle blown, the winning shot played, or the last set in the training session completed. Should these have involved a medal-winning performance, a premiership cup or the athlete's retirement, then this chapter may not be necessary. But for the vast majority of athletes, even if the immediate schedule reads 'rest', it is likely that another workout or competition event is looming on the horizon. Therefore, recovery is an important item on the athlete's agenda. As outlined in Chapter 2, recovery is the desirable process of adaptation to physiological stress. In the training situation, with correct planning of the workload and the recovery time, adaptation allows the body to become fitter, stronger or faster. In the competition scenario, however, there may be less control over the work to recovery ratio. A simpler but more realistic goal may be to face the next opponent, or the next round or stage in a competition, in the best shape possible. Recovery encompasses a complex range of processes which include:
In other words, although an athlete may appear to be 'resting', a lot of activity is occurring within the body. The traditional approach to recovery is a passive one—'let it happen'. Other athletes take an even less effective route—the 'make it even harder approach'. This might involve activities such as drinking excessive alcohol, further heat exposure via sun or saunas despite already being overheated, or failing to get sufficient rest or sleep. Such activities hamper recovery processes and/or add to the damage that must be repaired. The best approach is a proactive recovery. In dietary terms, this means providing the body with all the nutrients it needs, in a speedy and practical manner, so that refuelling, rehydration, repair and regeneration processes are all optimised. Where specific recovery processes have been identified and studied, clear nutritional guidelines can be stated. This is the case for rehydration and refuelling. Unfortunately, the post-exercise workings of the immune system, protein metabolism, anti-oxidant defence and many other issues relating to recovery remain unclear. This chapter will outline the guidelines that can be made with a good degree of certainty, and include a safety margin for ideas that are intuitively sensible. Future research will help to fill in the gaps. REFUELLING The muscle biopsy technique, introduced into sports science research in the 1960s, has made possible a large number of studies of muscle glycogen storage. Thanks to this technique, a number of factors that promote speedy resynthesis of the carbohydrate stores in a depleted muscle have been identified (see Table 14.1). Not surprisingly, athletes have been less willing to submit to having needles poked into their livers, so there have been few direct studies of the 'ins and outs' of liver glycogen storage in humans. However, it is known that the liver can deplete and restore its fuel levels quickly—it can empty after a few hours of heavy exercise, or after 10–12 hours without food (eg overnight). But it can also rapidly refuel within two to four hours after a high-carbohydrate meal. After exercise, the body gives priority to the recovery of muscle glycogen stores over liver stores. In fact, if the athlete does not eat carbohydrate immediately after exercise, the liver will work hard to convert compounds such as lactate and amino acids into glucose, and promote a low rate of muscle glycogen recovery. However, muscle refuelling is best achieved by supplying the body with carbohydrate-rich foods and drinks.
Refuelling and the amount of dietary carbohydrate The most important dietary factor affecting muscle glycogen refuelling is the amount of carbohydrate consumed. There is a direct relationship between the quantity of dietary carbohydrate consumed and post-exercise glycogen storage, at least until the muscle storage capacity has been reached. The daily upper limit for conversion of dietary carbohydrate into muscle glycogen appears to be 7–10 g of carbohydrate for each kg of body mass (BM)—or around 500–700 g of carbohydrate per day. This amount will vary between athletes according to the size of their muscle mass and other factors. However, when the aim is to maximise muscle glycogen storage, these are the carbohydrate intake targets to reach. Refuelling and timing of dietary carbohydrate Eating immediately after exercise also promotes speedy refuelling. The results of several studies have led to guidelines that the athlete should consume carbohydrate-rich foods and drinks, providing at least 1 g of carbohydrate for each kg BM (50–150 g of carbohydrate for most athletes) within 30 minutes of the completion of their exercise session. Since it is often difficult or unappealing to eat large meals after exercise, many athletes prefer to have a post-exercise snack and then ease back into a meal routine a couple of hours later. One study by Dr John Ivy from the University of Texas has suggested that muscle glycogen storage is slightly enhanced during the first couple of hours of recovery, because exercise has left the muscle more sensitive and with a greater capacity to take up blood glucose. After a couple of hours these benefits dissipate, and glycogen storage slows to more typical rates. While this finding has received much publicity, the more important message is that unless or until carbohydrate is consumed, muscle refuelling is very slow. Optimal refuelling is important when the first exercise session has substantially depleted glycogen stores and the recovery period until the next session is short (eg less than 4–12 hours). Therefore, when minutes count, it makes sense to provide the muscle with an early supply of carbohydrate and promote glycogen storage at full capacity. Over the day, it is not important whether carbohydrate is eaten as a series of small snacks, or as 'three square meals', provided that carbohydrate intake targets are met. Studies have shown that glycogen storage over 24 hours of recovery was similar when a high-carbohydrate diet was consumed as two huge meals or as seven smaller meals, or when four high-carbohydrate meals were redistributed into sixteen hourly snacks. The frequency of eating affects blood glucose and insulin profiles over the day, and each of these affect glycogen storage. So there may be some influence on muscle glycogen storage when it is working below its full capacity. However, if sufficient carbohydrate is consumed, this doesn't appear to be an issue. Whether the athlete prefers to 'nibble' their way through the day, or 'gorge' on a few larger meals, is a matter of individual preference and timetabling within a busy day. Refuelling and type of carbohydrate foods and drinks The choice of carbohydrate foods and drinks in the recovery diet is probably also more of a practical concern than direct physiological importance. Studies have found no difference in the rates of refuelling between liquid and solid forms of carbohydrate. However, there are confusing results from studies of carbohydrate food types, largely because researchers have looked at carbohydrate foods according to the 'simple' and 'complex' classification—a system that is unhelpful and somewhat misleading (Chapter 10). Research involving the Australian Institute of Sport and Professor Mark Hargreaves has investigated the glycaemic index (GI) of carbohydrate-rich foods and recovery. One study compared post-exercise recovery on a high-carbohydrate diet composed of foods with high GI, with a diet of an equal amount of carbohydrate provided by foods of low GI. The high GI diet produced significantly greater glycogen storage during 24 hours of recovery from prolonged cycling (106 mmol/kg) compared with the low GI diet (71 mmol/kg). However, this does not provide a major change to sports nutrition education, because in real life athletes don't eat diets composed only of low GI carbohydrate-rich foods such as lentils, legumes, oatmeal and sweetened dairy foods. Although recovery nutrition guidelines can include an encouragement to focus on foods of higher GI, this is largely a reinforcement of typical eating patterns. Since the major hurdle for most athletes is to consume sufficient carbohydrate—particularly immediately after exercise—the 'best' foods and drinks are those that lend themselves to these goals. Practical issues such as taste and appeal to the athlete are important factors to consider, especially when the athlete is hot and exhausted after exercise. Portability and ease of 'eating on the run' also need to be considered in a busy lifestyle. Athletes may favour 'compact' carbohydrate-rich foods and carbohydrate drinks, rather than bulky high-fibre food choices, in order to meet high carbohydrate intakes without feeling uncomfortably full. Other nutrients and overall nutritional needs It has been suggested that other nutrients eaten with carbohydrate-rich foods or meals could alter the rate of glycogen refuelling, primarily by changing blood glucose and insulin responses to meals. One study has reported that protein added to a post-exercise carbohydrate drink stimulates glycogen storage. However, subsequent research from the Australian Institute of Sport, using real foods, has shown that the protein and fat content of meals does not affect glycogen storage during 24 hours of recovery from prolonged exercise when adequate carbohydrate is consumed. The problem with eating large amounts of protein and fat in post-exercise meals, or recovery diets in general, is that most athletes will not have the stomach capacity or energy budget to consume their carbohydrate goals as well. Therefore, the advice to athletes is to focus on carbohydrate needs first, and look after other nutritional needs or concerns accordingly. There may be other reasons for including protein and other nutrients such as vitamins and minerals in snacks and meals eaten immediately after exercise. These nutrients are important in other recovery processes—for example, repair and rebuilding activities and immune responses—and an immediate intake may be useful in promoting these activities. This issue is still awaiting research. In the long term, eating patterns must balance carbohydrate recovery goals with many other nutritional concerns. Choosing carbohydrate-rich foods that are also good sources of other nutrients can help to achieve a number of everyday nutrition goals simultaneously. In tricky situations, particularly during or immediately post-exercise, the practical aspect of meeting a carbohydrate need may be the first priority, and the nutrient content of carbohydrate foods or drinks may be of less importance. However, in the bigger picture of the everyday training diet, or competition seasons lasting over weeks and months, the focus on nutritious carbohydrate-rich foods and drinks makes good sense. With a little creativity, the athlete can find foods that are both practical and nutritious. The panel on the following pages provides guidelines to eating for post-exercise refuelling which take all these factors into account.
Despite consuming fluid during exercise, most athletes will become mildly to moderately dehydrated. Studies show that most athletes typically replace between 30% and 70% of their sweat losses when they train or compete. More importantly, studies also report that even when the session is over and drinks are freely available, athletes do not fully replace their fluid losses. There can be a time lag of up to 24 hours before body fluid levels are competely restored. And in cases of severe fluid losses, or a sudden change to a hot or high-altitude environment, athletes may carry a fluid deficit from one day and one training session to the next. This is clearly not conducive to optimal recovery or peak performance in future exercise sessions. Ideally, an athlete should aim to fully restore fluid losses between exercise sessions. Difficulties arise when the fluid deficit is moderate to high (2–5% of BM or greater) and when the recovery interval is less than six to eight hours. One aspect of post-exercise rehydration is to ensure that the athlete consumes an adequate intake of fluid. However, there is an additional challenge. During recovery, the athlete will continue to lose fluid—partly due to continued sweating, but mostly through urination. The athlete will need to plan their fluid intake to account for physiological issues, such as overcoming inadequate thirst responses and minimising urine production, as well as practical difficulties such as poor opportunities to drink. Making athletes drink—is thirst sufficient? Thirst is not a sensitive and reliable indicator of dehydration. Most people are already mildly dehydrated (2% of BM) before they even feel thirsty. And then when they drink, thirst shuts off before fluid needs are fully replaced. In addition, there appears to be considerable individual variability in the reaction to thirst—some people are 'big drinkers' when they are dehydrated, while others are reluctant to drink much at all. What is on offer to drink makes a difference to how much fluid a dehydrated athlete will consume. Factors such as the taste, general palatability and temperature of a fluid can all influence the volume that is drunk. It is hard to know each person's individual preference, but a sweet taste appears to be attractive to most. A small amount of salt (sodium) also enhances the palatability of drinks offered to people who are dehydrated after exercise. Sports drink companies spend millions of dollars to find a taste profile that is appealing, and it appears to be money well spent. A study from the Exercise Research Laboratory of Professor Carl Gisolfi at the University of Iowa measured voluntary fluid consumption in dehydrated athletes after they had sweated 2% of BM by cycling in the heat. On two occasions, these cyclists were observed during three hours of recovery, while they rested, and were given free access to fluids. When the choice was water, subjects drank enough to replace 63% of their sweat losses. However, on the other occasion when sports drink was offered, total fluid consumption was significantly greater—replacing 79% of sweat losses. Interestingly, on neither occasion did the athletes fully meet their fluid needs. It is a paradox that advertisements for many sports drinks promote them as 'thirst quenchers'. In fact, the ideal sports drink should probably be the opposite! It should keep the athlete thirsty so that they want to keep drinking. Better rehydration for the athlete; better sales and profits for the company. The temperature of a drink also seems to be an important factor in encouraging intake. When an athlete is hot and sweaty, a cool drink is more welcoming than luke-warm or hot fluids. However, sometimes the perception of palatability and actual intake may not always go hand in hand. Studies suggest that while very cold water (0°C) might be rated as the most pleasurable drink, it is hard to quaff in large quantities. Therefore, cool drinks (10–15°C) are likely to promote greater intake. Urine is produced to help eliminate the body's waste products, and to keep body water and electrolyte concentrations in balance. An obligatory urine loss occurs over the day for this first purpose. When athletes sweat, they lose water and a small amount of electrolytes—principally sodium. Exercise dehydration produces a reduction in total body water and blood volume, and a mild increase in blood concentration and sodium content. Consuming large amounts of plain water after exercise causes dilution of blood contents, before the entire blood volume has been restored. In order to preserve blood concentrations within healthy limits, the body shuts off thirst to stop the athlete drinking, and produces urine to reduce the dilution. In effect, the athlete can produce large amounts of dilute urine, even though they are still dehydrated. However, by consuming some sodium in the rehydration fluids, volume and concentration can be restored in better harmony, without the need for excessive urine production. Professor Ron Maughan, an exercise physiologist from Aberdeen in Scotland, recently conducted a series of elegant rehydration studies. In his trials, athletes exercised to dehydrate by approximately 2% of BM and were then required to consume a specified quantity of fluids of varying compositions. Urine production and the restoration of blood volume and contents were monitored over six hours of recovery. Figure 14.1 shows the effect of the sodium concentration of various drinks on urine production and fluid balance. Low-sodium drinks (those containing either no or small amounts of sodium—25 mmol/L) produced significantly greater urine losses than drinks with higher sodium concentrations (those containing 50 and 100 mmol/L sodium). By the end of the recovery period, the difference in total urine production amounted to approximately 800 millilitres. With the low-sodium drinks, subjects were still dehydrated despite having consumed volumes equal to 150% of their fluid deficits. Studies from other laboratories have confirmed that until sodium losses are replaced, even forced intake of large volumes of water will not restore fluid balance after dehydration. Instead it will merely result in more urine production. This can be confusing for the athlete who thinks it is a sign of overhydration. And it can interfere with sleep patterns if the athlete has to continually get up in the night! Some fluids exacerbate urine losses in other ways. Caffeine and alcohol exert a diuretic effect on the body—that is, they increase urine production. A study from Professor Ed Coyle's laboratory at the University of Texas compared the efficiency of rehydrating after exercise with a sports drink (containing a small amount of sodium), water (no sodium) or a diet cola (no sodium, plus caffeine). Subjects were made to consume a volume of these drinks equal to their fluid deficit (2.5% of BM), and were monitored over two hours of recovery. The diet cola resulted in increased urine losses and a retention level of only 54% of fluid lost, while the sports drink (73% retention) was slightly superior to water (65% retention), probably due to its higher sodium content. Professor Maughan has also studied post-exercise rehydration with alcoholic beverages of 1–4% alcohol content and showed increased urine losses with the higher alcohol drink. This confirms the experience of many athletes who have found themselves making frequent visits to the bathroom while 'recovering' their fluid losses at a local hotel. While it is sometimes said that alcohol and caffeine drinks 'dehydrate' the athlete, this is not strictly true. When consumed, they add fluid to the system and improve hydration levels. However, the increase in urine losses compared to other drinks means that they are less efficient and effective as recovery fluids. When the situation calls for speedy rehydration, better fluids can be found. A recipe for fluid replacement When fluid deficits are greater than 1.5–2 litres, the athlete should consider both a plan of drinking and a considered choice of fluids. The 'ideal' will depend on the athlete and the situation. It appears sensible to actively replace sodium losses when the fluid deficit is significant and the time for rehydration is short. Common examples are when the athlete has dehydrated to 'make weight' before competition and there is only an hour or two between the weigh-in and the event, or where an athlete has just finished one event (eg a singles match in a tennis tournament) and the next session is scheduled within hours (eg a doubles match). If a meal or snack is eaten during this time, it is useful to include high-sodium foods or to add a little salt to what is consumed. Bread, breakfast cereals and pretzels are examples of carbohydrate-rich foods with a signficant salt content. Alternatively, salt may be provided in the sauces, fillings or dressings added to carbohydrate-rich foods. Commercial oral rehydration solutions provide a ready-made fluid and salt replacement alternative when solid food cannot be eaten. Typically they have a sodium concentration of 50–90 mmol/L (2–5 g or a teaspoon of salt per litre) which is specifically designed to maximise rehydration in clinical settings such as following gastrointestinal upsets. However, they taste quite salty—beyond the usual taste preferences of most people—and the athlete needs to be encouraged to drink a set amount of such drinks rather than leave it to voluntary intake. Sports drinks contain smaller amounts of sodium (10–25 mmol/L) and may promote more efficient rehydration than plain water. However, additional sodium intake from food sources may be necessary over the next hours to correct the final body fluid/sodium balance. In most situations in Westernised countries, people consume sodium far in excess of their requirements. Therefore, with time and food intake, balance will be restored. The most important issue for most athletes is to drink fluid in sufficient quantities—in excess of their fluid deficit and their thirst. Setting targets of intake and keeping a supply of fluids on hand are practical strategies that will assist in this goal. The panel on the following pages summarises guidelines for post-exercise rehydration.
A FEW WORDS ABOUT ALCOHOL AND RECOVERY It is hard to imagine the end of a Grand Prix race or a premiership final without champagne spraying from the victory dais. Alcohol and sport are closely linked—sponsorship money plays a big part in making many sports possible. And while there is no necessity to include alcohol in an athlete's diet, neither is there any reason to exclude it totally. One of the unfortunate ways that alcohol has been linked to sport is in the post-event (or post-training) drinking binge. Whereas once every now and again there may be a special celebration that warrants the inconvenience of a sore head the next morning, some athletes repeat this pattern at frightening frequency and with frightening ferocity, and to a level that affects their heath, other people and their performance—in both the short term and the long term. In some sports, but notably team sports, the tradition is to 'relax' and 'celebrate' or 'commiserate' the outcome by drinking alcohol together. This is often undertaken when the athlete is dehydrated and hasn't eaten for a number of hours, thus potentiating the absorption and effects of the alcohol. Often good sense goes out the window after a couple of drinks, and in a spirit of camaraderie or even competition, the athlete may overindulge considerably. There are many rationalisations about its benefits ('team bonding') and acceptability ('everybody else is doing it'), and minimisation of the disadvantages ('I can run it off the next day'). However, alcohol is a drug and, in large amounts, a poison. Excessive intake causes harm to the body—depending on the frequency and the level of the dose. It impairs the physiology of body recovery processes in a number of ways, including:
Most importantly, however, it interferes with good judgment and common sense. Athletes who are drunk rarely undertake the guidelines for recovery eating and drinking well—it simply isn't a priority. Alcohol may also have a small impact on the muscle's ability to store glycogen. But it has a major effect on whether the athlete cares about, and is capable of, meeting their carbohydrate intake goals. Most athletes fail to eat sufficient fuel-replacement foods when they are drinking—they drink rather than eat, or choose unsuitable high-fat takeaway foods. Carbohydrate intake is also sacrificed the next day as they sleep off their nausea and hangovers. In other words, recovery is considerably impaired and will affect the ability of the athlete to train (or compete) again the following day. Repeated occurrences of this pattern will greatly diminish the fitness and performance of the athlete. Ironically, the worst offenders are often professional team sports players who face the challenge of weekly (and sometimes, daily) competition, but appear to ignore the incentive of huge rewards and salaries for good performance. Alcoholic binges cause the same poor compliance to matters of treating injury or muscle damage. In fact, they increase the chance of accidents and high-risk behaviour off the field. In many sports there have been an unfortunate number of fatalities and major injuries occurring from accidents and motor vehicle crashes after the game or competition, involving alcohol-impaired athletes. It would be a shame if the excitement and celebration of fantastic sporting performances couldn't be toasted! However, alcohol intake is definitely an area in which the athlete should know and respect their limits (see the following panel).
see our Resources - Books page for ordering details |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Department of Sports Nutrition is a program of the
Australian Institute of Sport General enquires can be emailed to: aisnutrition@ausport.gov.au Copyright
© Australian Sports Commission
|